GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Conglomerates » Jiangsu Azure Corp (SZSE:002245) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Jiangsu Azure (SZSE:002245) Piotroski F-Score : 5 (As of May. 15, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2008. Start your Free Trial

What is Jiangsu Azure Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Jiangsu Azure has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SZSE:002245' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Jiangsu Azure was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.


Jiangsu Azure Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Jiangsu Azure Piotroski F-Score Chart

Jiangsu Azure Annual Data
Trend Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 7.00 5.00 5.00 5.00

Jiangsu Azure Quarterly Data
Jun19 Sep19 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 5.00

Competitive Comparison of Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score

For the Conglomerates subindustry, Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Conglomerates Industry

For the Conglomerates industry and Industrials sector, Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Net Income was 54.2 + 61.515 + 37.653 + 70.665 = ¥224 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -30.427 + 126.565 + 355.41 + 449.964 = ¥902 Mil.
Revenue was 1276.671 + 1445.249 + 1526.147 + 1429.24 = ¥5,677 Mil.
Gross Profit was 207.849 + 167.573 + 203.743 + 203.897 = ¥783 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar23)
to the end of this year (Mar24) was
(10997.566 + 11372.423 + 11298.546 + 11010.641 + 10559.649) / 5 = ¥11047.765 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar23) was ¥10,998 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥319 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥5,270 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥3,201 Mil.
Net Income was 150.74 + 52.766 + -25.343 + -12.55 = ¥166 Mil.

Revenue was 1962.173 + 1343.138 + 1139.851 + 973.789 = ¥5,419 Mil.
Gross Profit was 315.15 + 195.793 + 162.098 + 89.219 = ¥762 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar22)
to the end of last year (Mar23) was
(10397.47 + 13474.412 + 11692.128 + 11324.486 + 10997.566) / 5 = ¥11577.2124 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar22) was ¥10,397 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥338 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥5,609 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥3,284 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Jiangsu Azure's current Net Income (TTM) was 224. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Jiangsu Azure's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 902. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=224.033/10997.566
=0.02037114

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=165.613/10397.47
=0.0159282

Jiangsu Azure's return on assets of this year was 0.02037114. Jiangsu Azure's return on assets of last year was 0.0159282. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Jiangsu Azure's current Net Income (TTM) was 224. Jiangsu Azure's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 902. ==> 902 > 224 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=318.753/11047.765
=0.02885226

Gearing (Last Year: Mar23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Mar23
=338.019/11577.2124
=0.02919692

Jiangsu Azure's gearing of this year was 0.02885226. Jiangsu Azure's gearing of last year was 0.02919692. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5270.419/3201.1
=1.64643997

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=5608.6/3284.126
=1.70779075

Jiangsu Azure's current ratio of this year was 1.64643997. Jiangsu Azure's current ratio of last year was 1.70779075. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Jiangsu Azure's number of shares in issue this year was 1152.775. Jiangsu Azure's number of shares in issue last year was 1151.338. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=783.062/5677.307
=0.13792842

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=762.26/5418.951
=0.1406656

Jiangsu Azure's gross margin of this year was 0.13792842. Jiangsu Azure's gross margin of last year was 0.1406656. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar23)
=5677.307/10997.566
=0.51623305

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar22)
=5418.951/10397.47
=0.52117977

Jiangsu Azure's asset turnover of this year was 0.51623305. Jiangsu Azure's asset turnover of last year was 0.52117977. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+1+1+0+0+0+0
=5

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Jiangsu Azure has an F-score of 5 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Jiangsu Azure  (SZSE:002245) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Jiangsu Azure Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Jiangsu Azure's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Jiangsu Azure (SZSE:002245) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
No. 10, Xinjing Middle Road, Yangshe Town, Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu, Zhangjiagang, CHN, 215618
Jiangsu Azure Corp formerly Jiangsu Aucksun Co Ltd is a China-based company engaged in the areas of metal logistics and distribution, LED chips and new energy lithium batteries. The company provides complete supply chain services for warehousing, sorting, arranging, packaging, distribution and processing of metal materials.

Jiangsu Azure (SZSE:002245) Headlines

No Headlines