GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Consumer Cyclical » Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances » Zhang Xiaoquan Inc (SZSE:301055) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Zhang Xiaoquan (SZSE:301055) Piotroski F-Score : 6 (As of May. 17, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2021. Start your Free Trial

What is Zhang Xiaoquan Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Zhang Xiaoquan has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

SZSE:301055' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 5   Max: 6
Current: 6

During the past 7 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Zhang Xiaoquan was 6. The lowest was 4. And the median was 5.


Zhang Xiaoquan Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Zhang Xiaoquan Piotroski F-Score Chart

Zhang Xiaoquan Annual Data
Trend Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A N/A 4.00 5.00 5.00

Zhang Xiaoquan Quarterly Data
Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only N/A 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00

Competitive Comparison of Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score

For the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances subindustry, Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances Industry

For the Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar24) TTM:Last Year (Mar23) TTM:
Net Income was -2.126 + 2.924 + 15.847 + 7.662 = ¥24.3 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 31.091 + -9.485 + 74.891 + 1.057 = ¥97.6 Mil.
Revenue was 182.105 + 192.302 + 245.674 + 213.183 = ¥833.3 Mil.
Gross Profit was 60.297 + 70.112 + 89.158 + 77.195 = ¥296.8 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar23)
to the end of this year (Mar24) was
(983.394 + 968.698 + 937.74 + 1020.229 + 969.236) / 5 = ¥975.8594 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar23) was ¥983.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥1.3 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥455.2 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥302.3 Mil.
Net Income was 21.784 + 6.81 + 0.456 + 8.474 = ¥37.5 Mil.

Revenue was 229.671 + 217.701 + 170.279 + 191.4 = ¥809.1 Mil.
Gross Profit was 85.598 + 75.786 + 63.033 + 69.123 = ¥293.5 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar22)
to the end of last year (Mar23) was
(984.154 + 984.697 + 957.746 + 977.625 + 983.394) / 5 = ¥977.5232 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar22) was ¥984.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ¥1.8 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ¥427.1 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ¥268.9 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Zhang Xiaoquan's current Net Income (TTM) was 24.3. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Zhang Xiaoquan's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 97.6. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=24.307/983.394
=0.02471746

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar22)
=37.524/984.154
=0.03812818

Zhang Xiaoquan's return on assets of this year was 0.02471746. Zhang Xiaoquan's return on assets of last year was 0.03812818. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Zhang Xiaoquan's current Net Income (TTM) was 24.3. Zhang Xiaoquan's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 97.6. ==> 97.6 > 24.3 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=1.255/975.8594
=0.00128605

Gearing (Last Year: Mar23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar22 to Mar23
=1.789/977.5232
=0.00183014

Zhang Xiaoquan's gearing of this year was 0.00128605. Zhang Xiaoquan's gearing of last year was 0.00183014. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=455.163/302.297
=1.5056815

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=427.117/268.864
=1.5885987

Zhang Xiaoquan's current ratio of this year was 1.5056815. Zhang Xiaoquan's current ratio of last year was 1.5885987. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Zhang Xiaoquan's number of shares in issue this year was 153.244. Zhang Xiaoquan's number of shares in issue last year was 169.488. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=296.762/833.264
=0.35614403

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=293.54/809.051
=0.36282014

Zhang Xiaoquan's gross margin of this year was 0.35614403. Zhang Xiaoquan's gross margin of last year was 0.36282014. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar23)
=833.264/983.394
=0.84733484

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar22)
=809.051/984.154
=0.82207764

Zhang Xiaoquan's asset turnover of this year was 0.84733484. Zhang Xiaoquan's asset turnover of last year was 0.82207764. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+0+1+0+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Zhang Xiaoquan has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Zhang Xiaoquan  (SZSE:301055) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Zhang Xiaoquan Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Zhang Xiaoquan's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Zhang Xiaoquan (SZSE:301055) Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
No. 8, Wuxing Road, Dongzhou Street, Fuyang District, Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, CHN, 311401
Zhang Xiaoquan Inc is a is a modern living hardware company integrating design, research and development, production, sales and service. It offers home kitchen products, personal care products, garden and agronomic products, hotel kitchen utensils and others to consumers at home and abroad.

Zhang Xiaoquan (SZSE:301055) Headlines

No Headlines