Revolution Co (TSE:8894) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jul. 01, 2026) — 40% Below Median


TSE:8894 Revolution Co Ltd TSE:8894
58 GF Score
Price 円23.00
GF Value 円846.19
Valuation Possible Value Trap
! 10 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Revolution Co Piotroski F-Score?

Revolution Co TSE:8894 +4.55% 58 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 01, 2026, which is 40% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates TSE:8894 with a GF Score™ of 58/100 and a GF Value™ of 円846.19 (Possible Value Trap). The stock has 10 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,757 Real Estate companies, Revolution Co ranks worse than 81.22% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Revolution Co has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSE:8894' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Revolution Co was 7. The lowest was 2. And the median was 5.

Revolution Co  (TSE:8894) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Revolution Co Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Revolution Co Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Revolution Co Piotroski F-Score Chart

Revolution Co Annual Data
Trend Feb16 Feb17 Oct18 Oct19 Oct20 Oct21 Oct22 Oct23 Oct24 Oct25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 2.00 4.00 7.00 3.00

Revolution Co Semi-Annual Data
Aug16 Feb17 Aug17 Apr18 Oct18 Apr19 Oct19 Apr20 Oct20 Apr21 Oct21 Apr22 Oct22 Apr23 Oct23 Apr24 Oct24 Apr25 Oct25 Apr26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 7.00 0.00 3.00 0.00

TSE:8894 vs CBRE, BEKE, JLL: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Real Estate Services subindustry, Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Revolution Co Piotroski F-Score vs Real Estate Industry

For the Real Estate industry and Real Estate sector, Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


TSE:8894
58GF Score
Revolution Co Ltd TSE:8894
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Oct25) TTM:Last Year (Oct24) TTM:
Net Income was 円-17,232 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 円198 Mil.
Revenue was 円34,570 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円860 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Oct24)
to the end of this year (Oct25) was (51628.593 + 46802.271) / 2 = 円49215.432 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Oct24) was 円51,629 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円35,632 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円34,453 Mil.
Net Income was 円296 Mil.

Revenue was 円5,566 Mil.
Gross Profit was 円1,017 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Oct23)
to the end of last year (Oct24) was (1952.341 + 51628.593) / 2 = 円26790.467 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Oct23) was 円1,952 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was 円169 Mil.
Total Current Assets was 円33,834 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was 円32,238 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Revolution Co's current Net Income (TTM) was -17,232. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Revolution Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 198. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Oct24)
=-17232.188/51628.593
=-0.33377218

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Oct23)
=296.015/1952.341
=0.15162054

Revolution Co's return on assets of this year was -0.33377218. Revolution Co's return on assets of last year was 0.15162054. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Revolution Co's current Net Income (TTM) was -17,232. Revolution Co's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 198. ==> 198 > -17,232 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Oct25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Oct24 to Oct25
=8.5/49215.432
=0.00017271

Gearing (Last Year: Oct24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Oct23 to Oct24
=168.815/26790.467
=0.00630131

Revolution Co's gearing of this year was 0.00017271. Revolution Co's gearing of last year was 0.00630131. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Oct25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=35631.516/34453.233
=1.03419949

Current Ratio (Last Year: Oct24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=33833.862/32237.915
=1.04950528

Revolution Co's current ratio of this year was 1.03419949. Revolution Co's current ratio of last year was 1.04950528. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Revolution Co's number of shares in issue this year was 116.015. Revolution Co's number of shares in issue last year was 88.363. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=860.455/34570.459
=0.02488989

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=1017.154/5566.29
=0.18273464

Revolution Co's gross margin of this year was 0.02488989. Revolution Co's gross margin of last year was 0.18273464. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Oct24)
=34570.459/51628.593
=0.66959909

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Oct23)
=5566.29/1952.341
=2.85108493

Revolution Co's asset turnover of this year was 0.66959909. Revolution Co's asset turnover of last year was 2.85108493. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Revolution Co has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Revolution Co (TSE:8894) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jul. 01, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Revolution Co and its competitors. This is 40% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Revolution Co ranks #1427 out of 1757 companies in the Real Estate industry, placing it in the top 81.2%.
Is Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Revolution Co's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 7.00. The Real Estate industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Revolution Co's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Revolution Co ranks #1427 out of 1757 companies in the Real Estate industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Revolution Co has a GF Score™ of 58/100 and is considered Possible Value Trap, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Revolution Co's Piotroski F-Score compare to CBRE and BEKE?
According to the Real Estate industry distribution chart, Revolution Co ranks #1427 out of 1757 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Revolution Co in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Revolution Co's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Revolution Co's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Revolution Co has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Real Estate company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Real Estate companies is 5.00, based on 1,757 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Revolution Co's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Revolution Co and its competitors. For the Real Estate industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Revolution Co's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Revolution Co stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Revolution Co (TSE:8894) is currently considered Possible Value Trap. The stock's GF Value™ is 円846.19, compared to a current price of 円23.00 — trading 97.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 40% below the Real Estate industry median of 5.00. Revolution Co's overall GF Score™ is 58/100 with 10 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Revolution Co (TSE:8894), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jul. 01, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Revolution Co (TSE:8894) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Revolution Co stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of 円23.00 is trading 97.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of 円846.19. GuruFocus considers Revolution Co to be Possible Value Trap.

Key valuation signals for TSE:8894:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 3 (40% below median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: 円846.19 vs. price of 円23.00 (97.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 58/100 with 10 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% below the Real Estate median (#1427 of 1757)

No single metric tells the full story. See the TSE:8894 stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Revolution Co Business Description

Address 2-2-1 Hosoecho, Harahirosan Building, 4th floor, Shimonoseki, JPN, 750-0016
Revolution Co Ltd is engaged in real estate and construction. The services provided by the company include condominium sale, apartment sales representation, accommodation and management of rental housing, real estate management, construction contracting, and construction design supervision.
58GF Score

Get the complete analysis for TSE:8894

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

円23.00
Price
円846.19
GF Value