GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Financial Services » Asset Management » CI Financial Corp (TSX:CIX) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

CI Financial (TSX:CIX) Piotroski F-Score : 6 (As of Jun. 26, 2025)


View and export this data going back to 1994. Start your Free Trial

What is CI Financial Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

CI Financial has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSX:CIX' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 8
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of CI Financial was 8. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.


CI Financial Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

CI Financial Piotroski F-Score Chart

CI Financial Annual Data
Trend Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 6.00

CI Financial Quarterly Data
Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 6.00

Competitive Comparison of CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score

For the Asset Management subindustry, CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


;
;

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar25) TTM:Last Year (Mar24) TTM:
Net Income was 176.415 + -27.607 + -405.421 + -8.534 = C$-265 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 176.759 + 157.487 + 107.097 + 148.362 = C$590 Mil.
Revenue was 839.794 + 868.636 + 917.084 + 906.587 = C$3,532 Mil.
Gross Profit was 597.217 + 621.017 + 662.613 + 653.96 = C$2,535 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar24)
to the end of this year (Mar25) was
(10220.71 + 10524.505 + 10327.885 + 10764.758 + 11292.3) / 5 = C$10626.0316 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar24) was C$10,221 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$3,507 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$1,966 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$6,750 Mil.
Net Income was 50.953 + -12.415 + -63.489 + -154.436 = C$-179 Mil.

Revenue was 768.012 + 792.115 + 770.809 + 808.832 = C$3,140 Mil.
Gross Profit was 544.963 + 567.107 + 545.754 + 574.429 = C$2,232 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar23)
to the end of last year (Mar24) was
(9645.838 + 9756.162 + 9850.966 + 9981.603 + 10220.71) / 5 = C$9891.0558 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar23) was C$9,646 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$3,429 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$1,772 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$5,319 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

CI Financial's current Net Income (TTM) was -265. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

CI Financial's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 590. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-265.147/10220.71
=-0.02594213

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar23)
=-179.387/9645.838
=-0.01859735

CI Financial's return on assets of this year was -0.02594213. CI Financial's return on assets of last year was -0.01859735. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

CI Financial's current Net Income (TTM) was -265. CI Financial's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 590. ==> 590 > -265 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=3507.479/10626.0316
=0.33008362

Gearing (Last Year: Mar24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar23 to Mar24
=3429.202/9891.0558
=0.34669727

CI Financial's gearing of this year was 0.33008362. CI Financial's gearing of last year was 0.34669727. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1965.883/6749.892
=0.29124659

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1771.585/5318.875
=0.33307513

CI Financial's current ratio of this year was 0.29124659. CI Financial's current ratio of last year was 0.33307513. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

CI Financial's number of shares in issue this year was 143.373. CI Financial's number of shares in issue last year was 153.821. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2534.807/3532.101
=0.7176485

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2232.253/3139.768
=0.71096113

CI Financial's gross margin of this year was 0.7176485. CI Financial's gross margin of last year was 0.71096113. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar24)
=3532.101/10220.71
=0.34558274

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar23)
=3139.768/9645.838
=0.32550495

CI Financial's asset turnover of this year was 0.34558274. CI Financial's asset turnover of last year was 0.32550495. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+1+0+1+1+0+1+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

CI Financial has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

CI Financial  (TSX:CIX) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


CI Financial Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of CI Financial's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


CI Financial Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
15 York Street, 2nd Floor, Legal Department, Toronto, ON, CAN, M5J 0A3
CI Financial is a provider of asset- and wealth-management products and services. The company has a decent share in the Canadian fund market (fifth behind Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion, IGM Financial, and Fidelity at the end of last year) and remains the second-largest non-bank-affiliated asset manager in the Canadian market, with CAD 135.4 billion in assets under management (including CAD 36.0 billion in AUM managed for its CI Assante Wealth Management, CI Private Counsel, and Aligned Capital Partners subsidiaries) at the end of September. The firm also had CAD 350.7 billion in assets under advisement (including CAD 250.6 billion from its US wealth-management operations and CAD 100.1 billion from its Canadian wealth-management partners) and CAD 31.9 billion in custody assets.
Executives
Brigette Elizabeth Chang Director
Paul Perrow Director
William Thomas Holland Director
Yvette Zhang Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Hoi Sha Elsa Li Director or Senior Officer of 10% Security Holder
Jennifer Francine Sinopoli Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Manisha Burman Senior Officer
Darie Urbanky Senior Officer
Amarjit Kaur Anderson Senior Officer
Julie Lynn Silcox Senior Officer
Kurt Macalpine Director, Senior Officer
Christopher James Enright Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Sean Andrew Etherington Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Marc-andre Lewis Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Amit Muni Senior Officer