GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Basic Materials » Metals & Mining » Three Valley Copper Corp (OTCPK:TVCCF) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

TVCCF (Three Valley Copper) Piotroski F-Score : 3 (As of Dec. 12, 2024)


View and export this data going back to . Start your Free Trial

What is Three Valley Copper Piotroski F-Score?

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Three Valley Copper has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TVCCF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Three Valley Copper was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.


Three Valley Copper Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Three Valley Copper Piotroski F-Score Chart

Three Valley Copper Annual Data
Trend Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 2.00 4.00 3.00 5.00 3.00

Three Valley Copper Quarterly Data
Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 3.00 4.00 3.00 3.00

Competitive Comparison of Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score

For the Copper subindustry, Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep24) TTM:Last Year (Sep23) TTM:
Net Income was 0.28 + -0.052 + -0.126 + 0.024 = $0.13 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -1.016 + 0.054 + -0.482 + -0.715 = $-2.16 Mil.
Revenue was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Gross Profit was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $0.00 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep23)
to the end of this year (Sep24) was
(2.852 + 3.178 + 3.097 + 3.175 + 3.062) / 5 = $3.0728 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep23) was $2.85 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $3.06 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.05 Mil.
Net Income was 9.625 + -0.515 + -1.169 + -0.131 = $7.81 Mil.

Revenue was 3.494 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $3.49 Mil.
Gross Profit was -0.365 + 0 + 0 + 0 = $-0.37 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep22)
to the end of last year (Sep23) was
(91.812 + 5.31 + 4.934 + 2.988 + 2.852) / 5 = $21.5792 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep22) was $91.81 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $0.00 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2.85 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $0.01 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Three Valley Copper's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.13. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Three Valley Copper's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.16. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep23)
=0.126/2.852
=0.04417952

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=7.81/91.812
=0.08506513

Three Valley Copper's return on assets of this year was 0.04417952. Three Valley Copper's return on assets of last year was 0.08506513. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Three Valley Copper's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.13. Three Valley Copper's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -2.16. ==> -2.16 <= 0.13 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24
=0/3.0728
=0

Gearing (Last Year: Sep23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23
=0/21.5792
=0

Three Valley Copper's gearing of this year was 0. Three Valley Copper's gearing of last year was 0. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=3.062/0.045
=68.04444444

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.852/0.014
=203.71428571

Three Valley Copper's current ratio of this year was 68.04444444. Three Valley Copper's current ratio of last year was 203.71428571. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Three Valley Copper's number of shares in issue this year was 112.464. Three Valley Copper's number of shares in issue last year was 112.464. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=0/0
=

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=-0.365/3.494
=-0.1044648

Three Valley Copper's gross margin of this year was . Three Valley Copper's gross margin of last year was -0.1044648. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep23)
=0/2.852
=0

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep22)
=3.494/91.812
=0.03805603

Three Valley Copper's asset turnover of this year was 0. Three Valley Copper's asset turnover of last year was 0.03805603. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+0+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Three Valley Copper has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Three Valley Copper  (OTCPK:TVCCF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Three Valley Copper Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Three Valley Copper's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Three Valley Copper Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
217 Queen Street West, Suite 401, Toronto, ON, CAN, M5V 0R2
Three Valley Copper Corpis focused on growing copper production and exploration of its primary asset, MTV located in Salamanca, Chile.

Three Valley Copper Headlines