UAA (Under Armour) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jun. 25, 2026) — 25% Below Median


UAA Under Armour Inc UAA
59 GF Score
Price $6.06
GF Value $6.56
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 3 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Under Armour Piotroski F-Score?

Under Armour UAA +4.84% 59 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 25, 2026, which is 25% below its 10-year median of 4.00. GuruFocus rates UAA with a GF Score™ of 59/100 and a GF Value™ of $6.56 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 3 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,055 Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories companies, Under Armour ranks worse than 82.18% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Under Armour has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

UAA' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 4   Max: 8
Current: 3

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Under Armour was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 4.

Under Armour  (NYSE:UAA) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Under Armour Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Under Armour Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Under Armour Piotroski F-Score Chart

Under Armour Annual Data
Trend Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 7.00 3.00 3.00

Under Armour Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 5.00 4.00 5.00 3.00

UAA vs FIGS, COLM, GIII: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Apparel Manufacturing subindustry, Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Under Armour Piotroski F-Score vs Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories Industry

For the Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories industry and Consumer Cyclical sector, Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


UAA
59GF Score
Under Armour Inc UAA
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -2.612 + -18.814 + -430.827 + -43.39 = $-496 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 48.852 + -69.83 + 278.057 + -332.167 = $-75 Mil.
Revenue was 1134.068 + 1333.38 + 1327.761 + 1171.161 = $4,966 Mil.
Gross Profit was 546.496 + 630.584 + 589.74 + 492.038 = $2,259 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(4300.871 + 4865.191 + 4899.478 + 4629.983 + 4415.694) / 5 = $4622.2434 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $4,301 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,187 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2,719 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,677 Mil.
Net Income was -305.426 + 170.382 + 1.234 + -67.457 = $-201 Mil.

Revenue was 1183.665 + 1399.023 + 1401.039 + 1180.583 = $5,164 Mil.
Gross Profit was 562.675 + 696.132 + 665.155 + 550.782 = $2,475 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(4760.734 + 4860.511 + 4494.593 + 4630.965 + 4300.871) / 5 = $4609.5348 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $4,761 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $1,169 Mil.
Total Current Assets was $2,329 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was $1,109 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Under Armour's current Net Income (TTM) was -496. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Under Armour's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -75. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-495.643/4300.871
=-0.11524247

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-201.267/4760.734
=-0.04227646

Under Armour's return on assets of this year was -0.11524247. Under Armour's return on assets of last year was -0.04227646. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Under Armour's current Net Income (TTM) was -496. Under Armour's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -75. ==> -75 > -496 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=1186.748/4622.2434
=0.25674719

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=1169.402/4609.5348
=0.25369198

Under Armour's gearing of this year was 0.25674719. Under Armour's gearing of last year was 0.25369198. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2718.683/1676.786
=1.62136552

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2329.097/1109.143
=2.09990687

Under Armour's current ratio of this year was 1.62136552. Under Armour's current ratio of last year was 2.09990687. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Under Armour's number of shares in issue this year was 425.993. Under Armour's number of shares in issue last year was 429.344. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2258.858/4966.37
=0.45483079

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2474.744/5164.31
=0.47920129

Under Armour's gross margin of this year was 0.45483079. Under Armour's gross margin of last year was 0.47920129. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=4966.37/4300.871
=1.15473587

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=5164.31/4760.734
=1.0847718

Under Armour's asset turnover of this year was 1.15473587. Under Armour's asset turnover of last year was 1.0847718. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+0+1+0+1
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Under Armour has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Under Armour (UAA) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Under Armour and its competitors. This is 25% below median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Under Armour ranks #867 out of 1055 companies in the Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories industry, placing it in the top 82.2%.
Is Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Under Armour's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Under Armour's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Under Armour ranks #867 out of 1055 companies in the Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Under Armour has a GF Score™ of 59/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Under Armour's Piotroski F-Score compare to FIGS and COLM?
According to the Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories industry distribution chart, Under Armour ranks #867 out of 1055 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Under Armour in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Under Armour's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Under Armour's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Under Armour has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories companies is 5.00, based on 1,055 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Under Armour's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Under Armour and its competitors. For the Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Under Armour's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 25% below median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Under Armour stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Under Armour (UAA) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is $6.56, compared to a current price of $6.06 — trading 7.6% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 40% below the Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories industry median of 5.00. Under Armour's overall GF Score™ is 59/100 with 3 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Under Armour (UAA), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Under Armour (UAA) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Under Armour stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of $6.06 is trading 7.6% below its estimated GF Value™ of $6.56. GuruFocus considers Under Armour to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for UAA:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 3 (25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00)
  • GF Value™: $6.56 vs. price of $6.06 (7.6% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 59/100 with 3 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% below the Manufacturing - Apparel & Accessories median (#867 of 1055)

No single metric tells the full story. See the UAA stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Under Armour Business Description

Address 101 Performance Drive, Baltimore, MD, USA, 21230
Under Armour develops, markets, and distributes athletic apparel, footwear, and accessories in North America, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Latin America. Consumers of its performance-based clothing and shoes include professional and amateur athletes, sponsored college and professional teams, and people with active lifestyles. The company sells merchandise through wholesale partners, company-owned digital channels, and approximately 440 company-owned outlet and full-price stores. The Baltimore-based firm was founded in 1996 and is led by controlling shareholder Kevin Plank.
59GF Score

Get the complete analysis for UAA

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$6.06
Price
$6.56
GF Value