GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Industrial Products » RWT AG (WBO:RWT) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

RWT AG (WBO:RWT) Piotroski F-Score : 4 (As of May. 14, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2023. Start your Free Trial

What is RWT AG Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

RWT AG has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WBO:RWT' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 4   Max: 4
Current: 4

During the past 3 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of RWT AG was 4. The lowest was 4. And the median was 4.


RWT AG Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

RWT AG Piotroski F-Score Chart

RWT AG Annual Data
Trend Jan21 Jan22 Jan23
Piotroski F-Score
N/A N/A 4.00

RWT AG Semi-Annual Data
Jan21 Jan22 Jan23
Piotroski F-Score N/A N/A 4.00

Competitive Comparison of RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score

For the Specialty Industrial Machinery subindustry, RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Industrial Products Industry

For the Industrial Products industry and Industrials sector, RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jan23) TTM:Last Year (Jan22) TTM:
Net Income was €0.93 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was €0.00 Mil.
Revenue was €7.08 Mil.
Gross Profit was €5.05 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jan22)
to the end of this year (Jan23) was (9.026 + 9.27) / 2 = €9.148 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jan22) was €9.03 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €2.15 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €2.68 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €1.57 Mil.
Net Income was €0.81 Mil.

Revenue was €5.77 Mil.
Gross Profit was €4.21 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jan21)
to the end of last year (Jan22) was (7.773 + 9.026) / 2 = €8.3995 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jan21) was €7.77 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €2.52 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €2.28 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €1.25 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

RWT AG's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.93. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

RWT AG's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.00. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan22)
=0.931/9.026
=0.10314647

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jan21)
=0.806/7.773
=0.10369227

RWT AG's return on assets of this year was 0.10314647. RWT AG's return on assets of last year was 0.10369227. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

RWT AG's current Net Income (TTM) was 0.93. RWT AG's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 0.00. ==> 0.00 <= 0.93 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jan23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan22 to Jan23
=2.15/9.148
=0.23502405

Gearing (Last Year: Jan22)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jan21 to Jan22
=2.524/8.3995
=0.30049408

RWT AG's gearing of this year was 0.23502405. RWT AG's gearing of last year was 0.30049408. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jan23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.68/1.569
=1.70809433

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jan22)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.283/1.248
=1.82932692

RWT AG's current ratio of this year was 1.70809433. RWT AG's current ratio of last year was 1.82932692. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

RWT AG's number of shares in issue this year was 13.5. RWT AG's number of shares in issue last year was 13.5. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=5.052/7.078
=0.71376095

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=4.211/5.767
=0.73018901

RWT AG's gross margin of this year was 0.71376095. RWT AG's gross margin of last year was 0.73018901. ==> Last year's gross margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jan22)
=7.078/9.026
=0.78417904

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jan21)
=5.767/7.773
=0.74192718

RWT AG's asset turnover of this year was 0.78417904. RWT AG's asset turnover of last year was 0.74192718. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+0+0+0+1+0+1+0+1
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

RWT AG has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

RWT AG  (WBO:RWT) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


RWT AG Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of RWT AG's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


RWT AG (WBO:RWT) Business Description

Comparable Companies
Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Gseng 90, Russbach, Salzburg, AUT, 5442
RWT AG is a manufacturing company whose focus is on toolmaking, mold making, prototyping and assembly production. They also manufacture engine components and precision parts on a contract basis, including for the automotive, aircraft and motorsport industries.