GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Financial Services » Asset Management » Powerhouse Ventures Ltd (ASX:PVL) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

Powerhouse Ventures (ASX:PVL) Beneish M-Score : -1.49 (As of Apr. 11, 2025)


View and export this data going back to 2016. Start your Free Trial

What is Powerhouse Ventures Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Warning Sign:

Beneish M-Score -1.49 higher than -1.78, which implies that the company might have manipulated its financial results.

The historical rank and industry rank for Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

ASX:PVL' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.49   Med: -1.49   Max: -1.49
Current: -1.49

During the past 8 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Powerhouse Ventures was -1.49. The lowest was -1.49. And the median was -1.49.


Powerhouse Ventures Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Powerhouse Ventures Beneish M-Score Chart

Powerhouse Ventures Annual Data
Trend Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial - - - - -1.49

Powerhouse Ventures Semi-Annual Data
Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - - - -1.49 -

Competitive Comparison of Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score

For the Asset Management subindustry, Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Asset Management Industry

For the Asset Management industry and Financial Services sector, Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score falls into.


;
;

Powerhouse Ventures Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Powerhouse Ventures for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 2.0847+0.528 * 1+0.404 * 1.0867+0.892 * 0.6786+0.115 * 1
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 2.0988+4.679 * 0.084916-0.327 * 0.9024
=-1.49

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun24) TTM:Last Year (Jun23) TTM:
Total Receivables was A$0.12 Mil.
Revenue was A$0.95 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$0.95 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$2.56 Mil.
Total Assets was A$11.16 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was A$0.00 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was A$0.00 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was A$0.14 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$0.09 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.00 Mil.
Net Income was A$0.41 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$0.00 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was A$-0.54 Mil.
Total Receivables was A$0.08 Mil.
Revenue was A$1.40 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$1.40 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$3.12 Mil.
Total Assets was A$10.75 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was A$0.00 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was A$0.00 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was A$0.10 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$0.10 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$0.00 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(0.116 / 0.948) / (0.082 / 1.397)
=0.122363 / 0.058697
=2.0847

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(1.397 / 1.397) / (0.948 / 0.948)
=1 / 1
=1

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (2.556 + 0) / 11.164) / (1 - (3.121 + 0) / 10.746)
=0.77105 / 0.709566
=1.0867

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=0.948 / 1.397
=0.6786

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0 / (0 + 0)) / (0 / (0 + 0))
= /
=1

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(0.141 / 0.948) / (0.099 / 1.397)
=0.148734 / 0.070866
=2.0988

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((0 + 0.09) / 11.164) / ((0 + 0.096) / 10.746)
=0.008062 / 0.008934
=0.9024

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(0.405 - 0 - -0.543) / 11.164
=0.084916

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Powerhouse Ventures has a M-score of -1.49 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.


Powerhouse Ventures Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Powerhouse Ventures's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Powerhouse Ventures Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
N/A
Address
Ground Floor, 477 Boundary Street, Spring Hill, Sydney, NSW, AUS, 4000
Powerhouse Ventures Ltd is a venture capital firm specializing in incubation, early stage, and growth capital investments. The Company has operating one operating segment: investment in early stage companies using IP developed in emerging technologies such as electrification & decarbonisation, next generation computing, space technologies, and healthcare and wellness. The geographic segment is Australia. The company invests in deep-tech innovators solving global problems. The company invests in deep-tech innovators solving global problems.