GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Basic Materials » Metals & Mining » Piedmont Lithium Inc (FRA:6S3A) » Definitions » Beneish M-Score

Piedmont Lithium (FRA:6S3A) Beneish M-Score : -5.00 (As of Dec. 15, 2024)


View and export this data going back to 2017. Start your Free Trial

What is Piedmont Lithium Beneish M-Score?

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -5 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:6S3A' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5   Med: -5   Max: -5
Current: -5

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of Piedmont Lithium was -5.00. The lowest was -5.00. And the median was -5.00.


Piedmont Lithium Beneish M-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Piedmont Lithium Beneish M-Score Chart

Piedmont Lithium Annual Data
Trend Jun14 Jun15 Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Dec22 Dec23
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - - - - -

Piedmont Lithium Quarterly Data
Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only - - - - -5.00

Competitive Comparison of Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score

For the Other Industrial Metals & Mining subindustry, Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Metals & Mining Industry

For the Metals & Mining industry and Basic Materials sector, Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score falls into.



Piedmont Lithium Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of Piedmont Lithium for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 0.0459+0.528 * -1.6647+0.404 * 0.9208+0.892 * 0.9701+0.115 * 0.7602
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.9911+4.679 * -0.026396-0.327 * 1.1506
=-5.02

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep24) TTM:Last Year (Sep23) TTM:
Total Receivables was €0.97 Mil.
Revenue was 24.924 + 12.288 + 12.329 + -6.703 = €42.84 Mil.
Gross Profit was 2.39 + 0.582 + 0.636 + -16.584 = €-12.98 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €66.36 Mil.
Total Assets was €296.63 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €122.12 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €0.29 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €36.85 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €33.36 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €4.50 Mil.
Net Income was -15.035 + -12.385 + -21.722 + -23.283 = €-72.43 Mil.
Non Operating Income was -9.439 + -4.829 + -16.627 + 3.231 = €-27.66 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was -6.934 + -0.426 + -26.056 + -3.515 = €-36.93 Mil.
Total Receivables was €21.81 Mil.
Revenue was 44.158 + 0 + 0 + 0 = €44.16 Mil.
Gross Profit was 22.267 + 0 + 0 + 0 = €22.27 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €114.46 Mil.
Total Assets was €372.32 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was €110.44 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was €0.20 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was €38.33 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €40.16 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €1.14 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(0.972 / 42.838) / (21.814 / 44.158)
=0.02269 / 0.493999
=0.0459

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(22.267 / 44.158) / (-12.976 / 42.838)
=0.504257 / -0.302909
=-1.6647

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (66.362 + 122.122) / 296.634) / (1 - (114.455 + 110.443) / 372.317)
=0.364591 / 0.39595
=0.9208

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=42.838 / 44.158
=0.9701

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(0.202 / (0.202 + 110.443)) / (0.294 / (0.294 + 122.122))
=0.001826 / 0.002402
=0.7602

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(36.85 / 42.838) / (38.327 / 44.158)
=0.860218 / 0.867951
=0.9911

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((4.502 + 33.36) / 296.634) / ((1.141 + 40.16) / 372.317)
=0.127639 / 0.11093
=1.1506

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(-72.425 - -27.664 - -36.931) / 296.634
=-0.026396

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Piedmont Lithium has a M-score of -5.02 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.


Piedmont Lithium Beneish M-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Piedmont Lithium's Beneish M-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Piedmont Lithium Business Description

Address
42 E Catawba Street, Belmont, NC, USA, 28012
Piedmont Lithium Inc, is a U.S. based, development-stage, multi-asset, integrated lithium business in support of a clean energy economy and U.S. and world-wide energy security. Its portfolio of wholly-owned projects includes Carolina Lithium, a proposed fully integrated spodumene ore-to-lithium hydroxide project in Gaston County, North Carolina, and Tennessee Lithium, a proposed merchant lithium hydroxide manufacturing plant in McMinn County, Tennessee.

Piedmont Lithium Headlines

No Headlines