City Service SE (WAR:CTS) Beneish M-Score: -2.48 (As of Jun. 25, 2026)


WAR:CTS City Service SE WAR:CTS
79 GF Score
Price zł6.20
GF Value zł6.76
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 2 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is City Service SE Beneish M-Score?

City Service SE WAR:CTS 79 Beneish M-Score is -2.48 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus rates WAR:CTS with a GF Score™ of 79/100 and a GF Value™ of zł6.76 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,682 Real Estate companies, City Service SE ranks better than 58.44% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination for M-Score is as such:

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

Good Sign:

Beneish M-Score -2.48 no higher than -1.78, which implies that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

The historical rank and industry rank for City Service SE's Beneish M-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:CTS' s Beneish M-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.84   Med: -2.73   Max: -1.69
Current: -2.48

During the past 13 years, the highest Beneish M-Score of City Service SE was -1.69. The lowest was -3.84. And the median was -2.73.


City Service SE Beneish M-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for City Service SE's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

City Service SE Beneish M-Score Chart

City Service SE Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Beneish M-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -3.56 -3.84 -1.76 -2.16 -2.51

City Service SE Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Beneish M-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -2.13 -2.28 -2.38 -2.51 -2.48

WAR:CTS vs CBRE, BEKE: Beneish M-Score Comparison

For the Real Estate Services subindustry, City Service SE's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


City Service SE Beneish M-Score vs Real Estate Industry

For the Real Estate industry and Real Estate sector, City Service SE's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where City Service SE's Beneish M-Score falls into.


WAR:CTS
79GF Score
City Service SE WAR:CTS
Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

City Service SE Beneish M-Score Calculation

The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.

The M-Score Variables:

The M-score of City Service SE for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:

M=-4.84+0.92 * DSRI+0.528 * GMI+0.404 * AQI+0.892 * SGI+0.115 * DEPI
=-4.84+0.92 * 0.8191+0.528 * 0.9932+0.404 * 1.1665+0.892 * 1.1246+0.115 * 0.9659
-0.172 * SGAI+4.679 * TATA-0.327 * LVGI
-0.172 * 0.9294+4.679 * 0.007321-0.327 * 0.9658
=-2.42

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Total Receivables was zł169.6 Mil.
Revenue was 118.794 + 128.861 + 126.951 + 124.043 = zł498.6 Mil.
Gross Profit was 32.77 + 34.926 + 33.499 + 31.936 = zł133.1 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł220.3 Mil.
Total Assets was zł437.5 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was zł15.6 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was zł10.4 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was zł68.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł188.4 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł80.2 Mil.
Net Income was 6.619 + 10.693 + 11.787 + 11.244 = zł40.3 Mil.
Non Operating Income was 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = zł0.0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 4.444 + 8.201 + 12.115 + 12.38 = zł37.1 Mil.
Total Receivables was zł184.1 Mil.
Revenue was 106.695 + 114.379 + 113.64 + 108.684 = zł443.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was 30.803 + 27.75 + 30.188 + 28.831 = zł117.6 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł224.6 Mil.
Total Assets was zł391.8 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was zł12.5 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was zł7.8 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was zł65.5 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł166.9 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł82.2 Mil.




1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index

Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.

A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.

DSRI=(Receivables_t / Revenue_t) / (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1)
=(169.559 / 498.649) / (184.065 / 443.398)
=0.340037 / 0.415124
=0.8191

2. GMI = Gross Margin Index

Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.

Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.

GMI=GrossMargin_t-1 / GrossMargin_t
=(GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) / (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t)
=(117.572 / 443.398) / (133.131 / 498.649)
=0.265161 / 0.266983
=0.9932

3. AQI = Asset Quality Index

AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.

Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.

AQI=(1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) / (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=(1 - (220.303 + 15.62) / 437.513) / (1 - (224.605 + 12.458) / 391.83)
=0.460763 / 0.394985
=1.1665

4. SGI = Sales Growth Index

Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.

Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.

SGI=Sales_t / Sales_t-1
=Revenue_t / Revenue_t-1
=498.649 / 443.398
=1.1246

5. DEPI = Depreciation Index

Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.

DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.

DEPI=(Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) / (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t))
=(7.844 / (7.844 + 12.458)) / (10.413 / (10.413 + 15.62))
=0.386366 / 0.399992
=0.9659

Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.

6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index

The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.

SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.

SGAI=(SGA_t / Sales_t) / (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1)
=(68.504 / 498.649) / (65.543 / 443.398)
=0.137379 / 0.14782
=0.9294

7. LVGI = Leverage Index

The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.

An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage

LVGI=((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) / ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1)
=((80.17 + 188.417) / 437.513) / ((82.165 + 166.891) / 391.83)
=0.613895 / 0.635623
=0.9658

8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets

Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.

TATA=(IncomefromContinuingOperations_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t - CashFlowsfromOperations_t) / TotalAssets_t
=(40.343 - 0 - 37.14) / 437.513
=0.007321

An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.

City Service SE has a M-score of -2.42 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Beneish M-Score →
What does a Beneish M-Score of -2.48 mean?
City Service SE (WAR:CTS) has a Beneish M-Score of -2.48 as of Jun. 25, 2026. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on City Service SE and its competitors. According to the industry distribution chart, City Service SE ranks #699 out of 1682 companies in the Real Estate industry, placing it in the top 41.6%.
Is City Service SE's Beneish M-Score too high?
City Service SE's current Beneish M-Score is -2.48. Based on the distribution chart, City Service SE ranks #699 out of 1682 companies in the Real Estate industry, which is above the industry midpoint. Overall, City Service SE has a GF Score™ of 79/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does City Service SE's Beneish M-Score compare to CBRE and BEKE?
According to the Real Estate industry distribution chart, City Service SE ranks #699 out of 1682 companies for Beneish M-Score. This puts City Service SE in the upper half of its industry. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Beneish M-Score for a Real Estate company?
A good Beneish M-Score depends on the Real Estate industry context. However, Beneish M-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Beneish M-Score mean?
A high Beneish M-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Beneish M-score measures the likelihood of earnings manipulation. View historical data on City Service SE and its competitors. City Service SE's current Beneish M-Score is -2.48. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is City Service SE stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, City Service SE (WAR:CTS) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is zł6.76, compared to a current price of zł6.20 — trading 8.3% below its estimated fair value. The current Beneish M-Score is -2.48. City Service SE's overall GF Score™ is 79/100 with 2 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Beneish M-Score calculated?
Beneish M-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For City Service SE (WAR:CTS), the current Beneish M-Score is -2.48 as of Jun. 25, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is City Service SE (WAR:CTS) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, City Service SE stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of zł6.20 is trading 8.3% below its estimated GF Value™ of zł6.76. GuruFocus considers City Service SE to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for WAR:CTS:

  • Beneish M-Score: -2.48
  • GF Value™: zł6.76 vs. price of zł6.20 (8.3% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 79/100 with 2 warning signs

No single metric tells the full story. See the WAR:CTS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


City Service SE Business Description

Address Ozo Street 12A, Vilnius, LTU, 08200
City Service SE is a holding company. The company controls a group engaged in the provision of facility management and integrated utility services in Western, Central, and Eastern Europe. The principal areas of company activities include Apartment building administration, Commercial facility management, Territory cleaning & Maintenance, and Other activities. The Group is organized into business units based on services provided and has one main reportable segment: Buildings' administration, which includes services of administration and maintenance of commercial and residential buildings. Geographically, the company provides its services in Lithuania, which is its key revenue-generating market, and Latvia.
79GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:CTS

Beneish M-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł6.20
Price
zł6.76
GF Value