Transurban Group (ASX:TCL) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 26, 2026) — 33% Below Median


ASX:TCL Transurban Group ASX:TCL
75 GF Score
Price A$15.17
GF Value A$13.47
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 11 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Transurban Group Piotroski F-Score?

Transurban Group ASX:TCL +0.07% 75 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026, which is 33% below its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates ASX:TCL with a GF Score™ of 75/100 and a GF Value™ of A$13.47 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 11 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,734 Construction companies, Transurban Group ranks worse than 65.51% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Transurban Group has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

ASX:TCL' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 6   Max: 7
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Transurban Group was 7. The lowest was 4. And the median was 6.

Transurban Group  (ASX:TCL) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Transurban Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Transurban Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Transurban Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

Transurban Group Annual Data
Trend Jun16 Jun17 Jun18 Jun19 Jun20 Jun21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Jun25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 4.00

Transurban Group Semi-Annual Data
Jun16 Dec16 Jun17 Dec17 Jun18 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 6.00 0.00 4.00 0.00

Transurban Group Piotroski F-Score Competitor Comparison

For the Infrastructure Operations subindustry, Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Transurban Group Piotroski F-Score vs Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


ASX:TCL
75GF Score
Transurban Group ASX:TCL
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Jun25) TTM:Last Year (Jun24) TTM:
Net Income was A$133 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was A$1,515 Mil.
Revenue was A$3,770 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$2,565 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Jun24)
to the end of this year (Jun25) was (36694 + 35567) / 2 = A$36130.5 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Jun24) was A$36,694 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$19,289 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$2,353 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$3,969 Mil.
Net Income was A$326 Mil.

Revenue was A$4,119 Mil.
Gross Profit was A$2,734 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Jun23)
to the end of last year (Jun24) was (37720 + 36694) / 2 = A$37207 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Jun23) was A$37,720 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was A$18,332 Mil.
Total Current Assets was A$2,810 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was A$3,700 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Transurban Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 133. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Transurban Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,515. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun24)
=133/36694
=0.00362457

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Jun23)
=326/37720
=0.00864263

Transurban Group's return on assets of this year was 0.00362457. Transurban Group's return on assets of last year was 0.00864263. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Transurban Group's current Net Income (TTM) was 133. Transurban Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 1,515. ==> 1,515 > 133 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Jun25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun24 to Jun25
=19289/36130.5
=0.53387028

Gearing (Last Year: Jun24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Jun23 to Jun24
=18332/37207
=0.49270299

Transurban Group's gearing of this year was 0.53387028. Transurban Group's gearing of last year was 0.49270299. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Jun25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2353/3969
=0.59284455

Current Ratio (Last Year: Jun24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2810/3700
=0.75945946

Transurban Group's current ratio of this year was 0.59284455. Transurban Group's current ratio of last year was 0.75945946. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Transurban Group's number of shares in issue this year was 3104. Transurban Group's number of shares in issue last year was 3089. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2565/3770
=0.68037135

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2734/4119
=0.66375334

Transurban Group's gross margin of this year was 0.68037135. Transurban Group's gross margin of last year was 0.66375334. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Jun24)
=3770/36694
=0.10274159

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Jun23)
=4119/37720
=0.10919936

Transurban Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.10274159. Transurban Group's asset turnover of last year was 0.10919936. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+0+0+0+1+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Transurban Group has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Transurban Group (ASX:TCL) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Transurban Group and its competitors. This is 33% below median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Transurban Group ranks #1136 out of 1734 companies in the Construction industry, placing it in the top 65.5%.
Is Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Transurban Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 7.00. The Construction industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Transurban Group's value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Transurban Group ranks #1136 out of 1734 companies in the Construction industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Transurban Group has a GF Score™ of 75/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Transurban Group's Piotroski F-Score compare to competitors?
According to the Construction industry distribution chart, Transurban Group ranks #1136 out of 1734 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Transurban Group in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Transurban Group's value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Transurban Group's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Transurban Group has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Construction company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Construction companies is 5.00, based on 1,734 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Transurban Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Transurban Group and its competitors. For the Construction industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Transurban Group's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% below median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Transurban Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Transurban Group (ASX:TCL) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is A$13.47, compared to a current price of A$15.17 — trading 12.6% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 20% below the Construction industry median of 5.00. Transurban Group's overall GF Score™ is 75/100 with 11 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Transurban Group (ASX:TCL), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 26, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Transurban Group (ASX:TCL) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Transurban Group stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of A$15.17 is trading 12.6% above its estimated GF Value™ of A$13.47. GuruFocus considers Transurban Group to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for ASX:TCL:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (33% below median its 10-year median of 6.00)
  • GF Value™: A$13.47 vs. price of A$15.17 (12.6% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 75/100 with 11 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Construction median (#1136 of 1734)

No single metric tells the full story. See the ASX:TCL stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Transurban Group Business Description

Other Exchanges TRAUF:USATU9:Germany
Address 727 Collins Street, Level 31, Tower 5, Collins Square, Docklands, VIC, AUS, 3008
Transurban Group is an owner/operator of toll roads in Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane. It also owns toll roads in Virginia, USA, and Montreal, Canada. The weighted average concession life across the portfolio is about 25 years. Australian assets contribute around 90% of proportional revenue.
75GF Score

Get the complete analysis for ASX:TCL

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

A$15.17
Price
A$13.47
GF Value