Computer Age Management Services (NSE:CAMS) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 14% Below Median


NSE:CAMS Computer Age Management Services Ltd NSE:CAMS
93 GF Score
Price ₹798.30
GF Value ₹837.01
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Computer Age Management Services Piotroski F-Score?

Computer Age Management Services NSE:CAMS +0.14% 93 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 14% below its 10-year median of 7.00. GuruFocus rates NSE:CAMS with a GF Score™ of 93/100 and a GF Value™ of ₹837.01 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,743 Software companies, Computer Age Management Services ranks better than 78.75% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Computer Age Management Services has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Computer Age Management Services's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

NSE:CAMS' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4   Med: 7   Max: 8
Current: 6

During the past 9 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Computer Age Management Services was 8. The lowest was 4. And the median was 7.

Computer Age Management Services  (NSE:CAMS) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Computer Age Management Services Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Computer Age Management Services Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Computer Age Management Services's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Computer Age Management Services Piotroski F-Score Chart

Computer Age Management Services Annual Data
Trend Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only 8.00 4.00 7.00 7.00 6.00

Computer Age Management Services Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 4.00 3.00 0.00 6.00

NSE:CAMS vs IBM, ACN, FISV: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Information Technology Services subindustry, Computer Age Management Services's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Computer Age Management Services Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Computer Age Management Services's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Computer Age Management Services's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


NSE:CAMS
93GF Score
Computer Age Management Services Ltd NSE:CAMS
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was ₹4,760 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was ₹5,843 Mil.
Revenue was ₹15,162 Mil.
Gross Profit was ₹10,740 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was (15981.09 + 18103.763) / 2 = ₹17042.4265 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was ₹15,981 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹339 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹12,770 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹3,727 Mil.
Net Income was ₹4,702 Mil.

Revenue was ₹14,225 Mil.
Gross Profit was ₹10,041 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was (14142.075 + 15981.09) / 2 = ₹15061.5825 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was ₹14,142 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ₹569 Mil.
Total Current Assets was ₹11,124 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was ₹3,309 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Computer Age Management Services's current Net Income (TTM) was 4,760. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Computer Age Management Services's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 5,843. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=4760.057/15981.09
=0.29785559

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=4701.938/14142.075
=0.33247865

Computer Age Management Services's return on assets of this year was 0.29785559. Computer Age Management Services's return on assets of last year was 0.33247865. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Computer Age Management Services's current Net Income (TTM) was 4,760. Computer Age Management Services's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 5,843. ==> 5,843 > 4,760 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=339.121/17042.4265
=0.01989863

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=569.155/15061.5825
=0.03778853

Computer Age Management Services's gearing of this year was 0.01989863. Computer Age Management Services's gearing of last year was 0.03778853. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=12770.249/3727.419
=3.42602992

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=11123.73/3308.908
=3.36175258

Computer Age Management Services's current ratio of this year was 3.42602992. Computer Age Management Services's current ratio of last year was 3.36175258. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Computer Age Management Services's number of shares in issue this year was 248.852. Computer Age Management Services's number of shares in issue last year was 247.405. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=10740.332/15162.49
=0.70834883

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=10041.258/14224.833
=0.70589637

Computer Age Management Services's gross margin of this year was 0.70834883. Computer Age Management Services's gross margin of last year was 0.70589637. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=15162.49/15981.09
=0.94877696

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=14224.833/14142.075
=1.0058519

Computer Age Management Services's asset turnover of this year was 0.94877696. Computer Age Management Services's asset turnover of last year was 1.0058519. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+1+0+1+0
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Computer Age Management Services has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
Computer Age Management Services (NSE:CAMS) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Computer Age Management Services and its competitors. This is 14% below median its historical median of 7.00. Over the past decade, Computer Age Management Services' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Computer Age Management Services ranks #583 out of 2743 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 21.3%.
Is Computer Age Management Services' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Computer Age Management Services' current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 14% below median its 10-year median of 7.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 4.00 to a high of 8.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Computer Age Management Services' value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Computer Age Management Services ranks #583 out of 2743 companies in the Software industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Computer Age Management Services has a GF Score™ of 93/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Computer Age Management Services' Piotroski F-Score compare to IBM and ACN?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Computer Age Management Services ranks #583 out of 2743 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Computer Age Management Services in the top 21% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Computer Age Management Services' value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, Computer Age Management Services' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 4.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 7.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Computer Age Management Services has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,743 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Computer Age Management Services's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Computer Age Management Services and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Computer Age Management Services's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 14% below median its own 10-year median of 7.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Computer Age Management Services stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Computer Age Management Services (NSE:CAMS) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is ₹837.01, compared to a current price of ₹798.30 — trading 4.6% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 14% below median its 10-year median of 7.00 and 20% above the Software industry median of 5.00. Computer Age Management Services' overall GF Score™ is 93/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Computer Age Management Services (NSE:CAMS), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Computer Age Management Services (NSE:CAMS) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Computer Age Management Services stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of ₹798.30 is trading 4.6% below its estimated GF Value™ of ₹837.01. GuruFocus considers Computer Age Management Services to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for NSE:CAMS:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (14% below median its 10-year median of 7.00)
  • GF Value™: ₹837.01 vs. price of ₹798.30 (4.6% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 93/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% above the Software median (#583 of 2743)

No single metric tells the full story. See the NSE:CAMS stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Computer Age Management Services Business Description

Other Exchanges 543232:India
Address No. 158, Anna Salai,, 3rd Floor, Rayala Towers, Tower - I, Chennai, TN, IND, 600002
Computer Age Management Services Ltd is a technology-driven financial infrastructure and services provider to mutual funds and other financial institutions. The Group is mainly engaged in providing registrar and transfer agency services, including data processing and related activities for financial institutions. It provides technology-enabled infrastructure to mutual funds and supports the entire account lifecycle, from account creation to transaction processing and redemption of investments. Its product, UPI Offline Plus, is designed for offline UPI payments, offering real-time merchant onboarding, bulk QR code activation, dynamic settlement updates, automated split settlements, and API-enabled transaction tracking.
93GF Score

Get the complete analysis for NSE:CAMS

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

₹798.30
Price
₹837.01
GF Value