Vivid Games (WAR:VVD) Piotroski F-Score: 4 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 20% Below Median


WAR:VVD Vivid Games SA WAR:VVD
37 GF Score
Price zł0.61
GF Value zł0.19
Valuation Significantly Overvalued
! 6 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Vivid Games Piotroski F-Score?

Vivid Games WAR:VVD -0.33% 37 Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 20% below its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates WAR:VVD with a GF Score™ of 37/100 and a GF Value™ of zł0.19 (Significantly Overvalued). The stock has 6 warning signs investors should review. Among 550 Interactive Media companies, Vivid Games ranks worse than 61.27% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Vivid Games has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Vivid Games's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

WAR:VVD' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 4

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Vivid Games was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

Vivid Games  (WAR:VVD) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Vivid Games Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Vivid Games Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Vivid Games's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Vivid Games Piotroski F-Score Chart

Vivid Games Annual Data
Trend Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 5.00 6.00 4.00

Vivid Games Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00

WAR:VVD vs NTES, EA, TTWO: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia subindustry, Vivid Games's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Vivid Games Piotroski F-Score vs Interactive Media Industry

For the Interactive Media industry and Communication Services sector, Vivid Games's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Vivid Games's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


WAR:VVD
37GF Score
Vivid Games SA WAR:VVD
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was -2.122 + -0.637 + -1.836 + -0.679 = zł-5.27 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 0.369 + -0.323 + -0.36 + -0.585 = zł-0.90 Mil.
Revenue was 2.06 + 2.136 + 2.028 + 2.261 = zł8.49 Mil.
Gross Profit was 3.868 + 3.43 + 3.398 + 3.872 = zł14.57 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(15.064 + 14.215 + 19.811 + 18.048 + 16.181) / 5 = zł16.6638 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was zł15.06 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł9.24 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł2.84 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł3.90 Mil.
Net Income was -0.028 + -0.425 + -0.144 + 0.099 = zł-0.50 Mil.

Revenue was 3.478 + 2.769 + 3.639 + 2.945 = zł12.83 Mil.
Gross Profit was 4.496 + 3.695 + 5.014 + 4.435 = zł17.64 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(13.533 + 13.629 + 14.496 + 14.771 + 15.064) / 5 = zł14.2986 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was zł13.53 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was zł0.72 Mil.
Total Current Assets was zł1.94 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was zł4.13 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Vivid Games's current Net Income (TTM) was -5.27. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Vivid Games's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.90. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=-5.274/15.064
=-0.35010621

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=-0.498/13.533
=-0.03679894

Vivid Games's return on assets of this year was -0.35010621. Vivid Games's return on assets of last year was -0.03679894. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Vivid Games's current Net Income (TTM) was -5.27. Vivid Games's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.90. ==> -0.90 > -5.27 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=9.237/16.6638
=0.55431534

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=0.718/14.2986
=0.05021471

Vivid Games's gearing of this year was 0.55431534. Vivid Games's gearing of last year was 0.05021471. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2.841/3.898
=0.7288353

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=1.939/4.125
=0.47006061

Vivid Games's current ratio of this year was 0.7288353. Vivid Games's current ratio of last year was 0.47006061. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Vivid Games's number of shares in issue this year was 55.536. Vivid Games's number of shares in issue last year was 55.536. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=14.568/8.485
=1.7169122

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=17.64/12.831
=1.37479542

Vivid Games's gross margin of this year was 1.7169122. Vivid Games's gross margin of last year was 1.37479542. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=8.485/15.064
=0.56326341

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=12.831/13.533
=0.9481268

Vivid Games's asset turnover of this year was 0.56326341. Vivid Games's asset turnover of last year was 0.9481268. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+1+1+1+0
=4

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Vivid Games has an F-score of 4 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 4 mean?
Vivid Games (WAR:VVD) has a Piotroski F-Score of 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Vivid Games and its competitors. This is 20% below median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, Vivid Games' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Vivid Games ranks #337 out of 550 companies in the Interactive Media industry, placing it in the top 61.3%.
Is Vivid Games' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Vivid Games' current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Interactive Media industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Vivid Games' value of 4 is 20% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Vivid Games ranks #337 out of 550 companies in the Interactive Media industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, Vivid Games has a GF Score™ of 37/100 and is considered Significantly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Vivid Games' Piotroski F-Score compare to NTES and EA?
According to the Interactive Media industry distribution chart, Vivid Games ranks #337 out of 550 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Vivid Games in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Vivid Games' value of 4 is 20% below this benchmark. Historically, Vivid Games' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Vivid Games has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Interactive Media company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Interactive Media companies is 5.00, based on 550 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Vivid Games's current Piotroski F-Score of 4 is 20% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Vivid Games and its competitors. For the Interactive Media industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Vivid Games's current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Vivid Games stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Vivid Games (WAR:VVD) is currently considered Significantly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is zł0.19, compared to a current price of zł0.61 — trading 219.5% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 4, which is 20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% below the Interactive Media industry median of 5.00. Vivid Games' overall GF Score™ is 37/100 with 6 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Vivid Games (WAR:VVD), the current Piotroski F-Score is 4 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Vivid Games (WAR:VVD) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Vivid Games stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of zł0.61 is trading 219.5% above its estimated GF Value™ of zł0.19. GuruFocus considers Vivid Games to be Significantly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for WAR:VVD:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 4 (20% below median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: zł0.19 vs. price of zł0.61 (219.5% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 37/100 with 6 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 20% below the Interactive Media median (#337 of 550)

No single metric tells the full story. See the WAR:VVD stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Vivid Games Business Description

Address Gdansk 160, Bydgoszcz, POL, 85674
Vivid Games SA is a leading mobile games development studio in Poland. The company produces top-notch mobile entertainment. It also designs and develops games for Android, iOS, PSP Minis, Mobile, NDS, MAC, PC and DSi operating systems.
37GF Score

Get the complete analysis for WAR:VVD

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

zł0.61
Price
zł0.19
GF Value