Tibet Water Resources Beneish M-Score Historical Data
The historical data trend for Tibet Water Resources's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Tibet Water Resources Beneish M-Score Chart
|
Tibet Water Resources Annual Data
|
|
Trend |
Dec14 |
Dec15 |
Dec16 |
Dec17 |
Dec18 |
Dec19 |
Dec20 |
Dec21 |
Dec22 |
Dec23 |
| Beneish M-Score |
|
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
-3.92 |
-1.66 |
-2.64 |
-3.48 |
-2.22 |
|
Tibet Water Resources Semi-Annual Data
|
|
Dec14 |
Jun15 |
Dec15 |
Jun16 |
Dec16 |
Jun17 |
Dec17 |
Jun18 |
Dec18 |
Jun19 |
Dec19 |
Jun20 |
Dec20 |
Jun21 |
Dec21 |
Jun22 |
Dec22 |
Jun23 |
Dec23 |
Jun24 |
| Beneish M-Score |
Get a 7-Day Free Trial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
-3.48 |
- |
-2.22 |
- |
Competitive Comparison of Tibet Water Resources's Beneish M-Score
For the Beverages - Brewers subindustry, Tibet Water Resources's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Tibet Water Resources's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Beverages - Alcoholic Industry
For the Beverages - Alcoholic industry and Consumer Defensive sector, Tibet Water Resources's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Tibet Water Resources's Beneish M-Score falls into.
Tibet Water Resources Beneish M-Score Calculation
The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.
The M-Score Variables:
The M-score of Tibet Water Resources for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:
| M | = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * DSRI | + | 0.528 * GMI | + | 0.404 * AQI | + | 0.892 * SGI | + | 0.115 * DEPI |
| = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * 1.3398 | + | 0.528 * 1.1803 | + | 0.404 * 0.9291 | + | 0.892 * 0.9873 | + | 0.115 * 0.9184 |
| - | 0.172 * SGAI | + | 4.679 * TATA | - | 0.327 * LVGI |
| - | 0.172 * 1.3191 | + | 4.679 * -0.015184 | - | 0.327 * 0.9182 |
| = | -2.22 |
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
| This Year (Dec23) TTM: | Last Year (Dec22) TTM: |
Total Receivables was HK$281.4 Mil.
Revenue was HK$343.9 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$84.9 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$1,812.0 Mil.
Total Assets was HK$4,359.3 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was HK$371.7 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was HK$64.6 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was HK$152.3 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$1,160.2 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$60.2 Mil.
Net Income was HK$-386.0 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$0.0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was HK$-319.8 Mil.
|
Total Receivables was HK$212.7 Mil.
Revenue was HK$348.4 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$101.5 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$1,714.0 Mil.
Total Assets was HK$4,623.3 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was HK$425.9 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was HK$67.0 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was HK$116.9 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$1,064.9 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$344.8 Mil.
|
1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index
Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.
A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.
| DSRI | = | (Receivables_t / Revenue_t) | / | (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) |
| = | (281.393 / 343.915) | / | (212.733 / 348.356) |
| = | 0.818205 | / | 0.610677 |
| | = | 1.3398 |
2. GMI = Gross Margin Index
Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.
Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.
| GMI | = | GrossMargin_t-1 | / | GrossMargin_t |
| = | (GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) | / | (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t) |
| = | (101.492 / 348.356) | / | (84.893 / 343.915) |
| = | 0.291346 | / | 0.246843 |
| | = | 1.1803 |
3. AQI = Asset Quality Index
AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.
Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.
| AQI | = | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | (1 - (1812.018 + 371.662) / 4359.317) | / | (1 - (1714.036 + 425.883) / 4623.347) |
| = | 0.499077 | / | 0.537149 |
| | = | 0.9291 |
4. SGI = Sales Growth Index
Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.
Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.
| SGI | = | Sales_t | / | Sales_t-1 |
| = | Revenue_t | / | Revenue_t-1 |
| = | 343.915 | / | 348.356 |
| | = | 0.9873 |
5. DEPI = Depreciation Index
Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.
DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.
| DEPI | = | (Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) | / | (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t)) |
| = | (67.01 / (67.01 + 425.883)) | / | (64.575 / (64.575 + 371.662)) |
| = | 0.135952 | / | 0.148027 |
| | = | 0.9184 |
Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.
6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index
The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.
SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.
| SGAI | = | (SGA_t / Sales_t) | / | (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1) |
| = | (152.282 / 343.915) | / | (116.933 / 348.356) |
| = | 0.44279 | / | 0.335671 |
| | = | 1.3191 |
7. LVGI = Leverage Index
The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.
An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage
| LVGI | = | ((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | ((60.237 + 1160.201) / 4359.317) | / | ((344.79 + 1064.895) / 4623.347) |
| = | 0.279961 | / | 0.304906 |
| | = | 0.9182 |
8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets
Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.
| TATA | = | (IncomefromContinuingOperations_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (-385.958 - 0 | - | -319.766) | / | 4359.317 |
| | = | -0.015184 |
An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.
Tibet Water Resources has a M-score of -2.22 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
HKSE:01115 has been successfully added to your