Chenqi Technology Beneish M-Score Historical Data
The historical data trend for Chenqi Technology's Beneish M-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
Chenqi Technology Beneish M-Score Chart
|
Chenqi Technology Annual Data
|
|
Trend |
Dec21 |
Dec22 |
Dec23 |
| Beneish M-Score |
|
- |
- |
-1.59 |
|
Chenqi Technology Semi-Annual Data
|
|
Dec21 |
Dec22 |
Jun23 |
Dec23 |
Jun24 |
| Beneish M-Score |
- |
- |
- |
-1.59 |
- |
Competitive Comparison of Chenqi Technology's Beneish M-Score
For the Rental & Leasing Services subindustry, Chenqi Technology's Beneish M-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Beneish M-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Chenqi Technology's Beneish M-Score Distribution in the Business Services Industry
For the Business Services industry and Industrials sector, Chenqi Technology's Beneish M-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Chenqi Technology's Beneish M-Score falls into.
Chenqi Technology Beneish M-Score Calculation
The M-score was created by Professor Messod Beneish. Instead of measuring the bankruptcy risk (Altman Z-Score) or business trend (Piotroski F-Score), M-score can be used to detect the risk of earnings manipulation. This is the original research paper on M-score.
The M-Score Variables:
The M-score of Chenqi Technology for today is based on a combination of the following eight different indices:
| M | = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * DSRI | + | 0.528 * GMI | + | 0.404 * AQI | + | 0.892 * SGI | + | 0.115 * DEPI |
| = | -4.84 | + | 0.92 * 1.3528 | + | 0.528 * 1.5317 | + | 0.404 * 1.9563 | + | 0.892 * 1.5469 | + | 0.115 * 1.0278 |
| - | 0.172 * SGAI | + | 4.679 * TATA | - | 0.327 * LVGI |
| - | 0.172 * 0.6817 | + | 4.679 * -0.118811 | - | 0.327 * 1.2897 |
| = | -1.59 |
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
| This Year (Dec23) TTM: | Last Year (Dec22) TTM: |
Total Receivables was HK$69 Mil.
Revenue was HK$2,364 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$-165 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$849 Mil.
Total Assets was HK$1,010 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was HK$121 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was HK$39 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was HK$230 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$2,548 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$26 Mil.
Net Income was HK$-758 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$0 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was HK$-638 Mil.
|
Total Receivables was HK$33 Mil.
Revenue was HK$1,528 Mil.
Gross Profit was HK$-163 Mil.
Total Current Assets was HK$763 Mil.
Total Assets was HK$857 Mil.
Property, Plant and Equipment(Net PPE) was HK$77 Mil.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization(DDA) was HK$25 Mil.
Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) was HK$218 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was HK$1,668 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was HK$26 Mil.
|
1. DSRI = Days Sales in Receivables Index
Measured as the ratio of Revenue in Total Receivables in year t to year t-1.
A large increase in DSR could be indicative of revenue inflation.
| DSRI | = | (Receivables_t / Revenue_t) | / | (Receivables_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) |
| = | (68.669 / 2363.725) | / | (32.814 / 1528.067) |
| = | 0.029051 | / | 0.021474 |
| | = | 1.3528 |
2. GMI = Gross Margin Index
Measured as the ratio of gross margin in year t-1 to gross margin in year t.
Gross margin has deteriorated when this index is above 1. A firm with poorer prospects is more likely to manipulate earnings.
| GMI | = | GrossMargin_t-1 | / | GrossMargin_t |
| = | (GrossProfit_t-1 / Revenue_t-1) | / | (GrossProfit_t / Revenue_t) |
| = | (-162.94 / 1528.067) | / | (-164.554 / 2363.725) |
| = | -0.106631 | / | -0.069616 |
| | = | 1.5317 |
3. AQI = Asset Quality Index
AQI is the ratio of asset quality in year t to year t-1.
Asset quality is measured as the ratio of non-current assets other than Property, Plant and Equipment to Total Assets.
| AQI | = | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t + PPE_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | (1 - (CurrentAssets_t-1 + PPE_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | (1 - (848.512 + 121.187) / 1009.597) | / | (1 - (762.64 + 77.168) / 857.123) |
| = | 0.039519 | / | 0.020201 |
| | = | 1.9563 |
4. SGI = Sales Growth Index
Ratio of Revenue in year t to sales in year t-1.
Sales growth is not itself a measure of manipulation. However, growth companies are likely to find themselves under pressure to manipulate in order to keep up appearances.
| SGI | = | Sales_t | / | Sales_t-1 |
| = | Revenue_t | / | Revenue_t-1 |
| = | 2363.725 | / | 1528.067 |
| | = | 1.5469 |
5. DEPI = Depreciation Index
Measured as the ratio of the rate of Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization in year t-1 to the corresponding rate in year t.
DEPI greater than 1 indicates that assets are being depreciated at a slower rate. This suggests that the firm might be revising useful asset life assumptions upwards, or adopting a new method that is income friendly.
| DEPI | = | (Depreciation_t-1 / (Depreciaton_t-1 + PPE_t-1)) | / | (Depreciation_t / (Depreciaton_t + PPE_t)) |
| = | (25.422 / (25.422 + 77.168)) | / | (38.502 / (38.502 + 121.187)) |
| = | 0.247802 | / | 0.241106 |
| | = | 1.0278 |
Note: If the Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization data is not available, we assume that the depreciation rate is constant and set the Depreciation Index to 1.
6. SGAI = Sales, General and Administrative expenses Index
The ratio of Selling, General, & Admin. Expense(SGA) to Sales in year t relative to year t-1.
SGA expenses index > 1 means that the company is becoming less efficient in generate sales.
| SGAI | = | (SGA_t / Sales_t) | / | (SGA_t-1 /Sales_t-1) |
| = | (230.12 / 2363.725) | / | (218.238 / 1528.067) |
| = | 0.097355 | / | 0.14282 |
| | = | 0.6817 |
7. LVGI = Leverage Index
The ratio of total debt to Total Assets in year t relative to yeat t-1.
An LVGI > 1 indicates an increase in leverage
| LVGI | = | ((LTD_t + CurrentLiabilities_t) / TotalAssets_t) | / | ((LTD_t-1 + CurrentLiabilities_t-1) / TotalAssets_t-1) |
| = | ((26.159 + 2547.722) / 1009.597) | / | ((25.95 + 1668.307) / 857.123) |
| = | 2.549414 | / | 1.976679 |
| | = | 1.2897 |
8. TATA = Total Accruals to Total Assets
Total accruals calculated as the change in working capital accounts other than cash less depreciation.
| TATA | = | (IncomefromContinuingOperations_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (NetIncome_t - NonOperatingIncome_t | - | CashFlowsfromOperations_t) | / | TotalAssets_t |
| = | (-757.763 - 0 | - | -637.812) | / | 1009.597 |
| | = | -0.118811 |
An M-Score of equal or less than -1.78 suggests that the company is unlikely to be a manipulator. An M-Score of greater than -1.78 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.
Chenqi Technology has a M-score of -1.59 signals that the company is likely to be a manipulator.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
Portfolio Contest
HKSE:09680 has been successfully added to your