Ageas/ NVCHIX:AGSB 68 Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is 17% above its 10-year median of 6.00. GuruFocus rates CHIX:AGSB with a GF Score™ of 68/100 and a GF Value™ of €55.63 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 8 warning signs investors should review. Among 487 Insurance companies, Ageas/ NV ranks better than 81.31% on this metric.
Good Sign:
Piotroski F-Score is 7, indicates a very healthy situation.
The zones of discrimination were as such:
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Ageas/ NV has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.
The historical rank and industry rank for Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:
CHIX:AGSb'
s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5 Med: 6 Max: 8
Current: 7
During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Ageas/ NV was 8. The lowest was 5. And the median was 6.
The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.
He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.
He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.
What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.
Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.
Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).
Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.
Ageas/ NV Piotroski F-Score Related Terms
Ageas/ NV Piotroski F-Score Historical Data
* Premium members only.
The historical data trend for Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
CHIX:AGSB vs BRK.A, AIG, HIG: Piotroski F-Score Comparison
For the Insurance - Diversified subindustry, Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:
* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.
Ageas/ NV Piotroski F-Score vs Insurance Industry
For the Insurance industry and Financial Services sector, Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:
* The bar in red indicates where Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score falls into.
* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD. * For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.
*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.
Profitability
Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)
Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.
Ageas/ NV's current Net Income (TTM) was 1,712.
==> Positive ==> Score 1.
Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)
Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.
Ageas/ NV's return on assets of this year was 0.01738865. Ageas/ NV's return on assets of last year was 0.01156237.
==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)
Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)
Ageas/ NV's gearing of this year was 0.06935308. Ageas/ NV's gearing of last year was 0.04867075.
==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.
Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)
Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.
Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.
Ageas/ NV's current ratio of this year was 1.12036204. Ageas/ NV's current ratio of last year was 1.09811729.
==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue
Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.
Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.
Ageas/ NV's number of shares in issue this year was 188.243. Ageas/ NV's number of shares in issue last year was 183.589.
==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.
Efficiency
Question 8. Change in Gross Margin
Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.
Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.
* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.
Ageas/ NV's net margin of this year was 0.18929677. Ageas/ NV's net margin of last year was 0.12944309.
==> This year's net margin is higher. ==> Score 1.
Question 9. Change in asset turnover
Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.
Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower
Ageas/ NV's asset turnover of this year was 0.09185923. Ageas/ NV's asset turnover of last year was 0.08932394.
==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.
Evaluation
Piotroski F-Score
=
Que. 1
+
Que. 2
+
Que. 3
+
Que. 4
+
Que. 5
+
Que. 6
+
Que. 7
+
Que. 8
+
Que. 9
=
1
+
1
+
1
+
1
+
0
+
1
+
0
+
1
+
1
=
7
Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3
Ageas/ NV has an F-score of 7. It is a good or high score, which usually indicates a very healthy situation.
Ageas/ NV (CHIX:AGSB) has a Piotroski F-Score of 7 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ageas/ NV and its competitors. This is 17% above median its historical median of 6.00. Over the past decade, Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Ageas/ NV ranks #91 out of 487 companies in the Insurance industry, placing it in the top 18.7%.
Is Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Ageas/ NV's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 5.00 to a high of 8.00. The Insurance industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Ageas/ NV's value of 7 is 16.7% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Ageas/ NV ranks #91 out of 487 companies in the Insurance industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, Ageas/ NV has a GF Score™ of 68/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Ageas/ NV's Piotroski F-Score compare to BRK.A and AIG?
According to the Insurance industry distribution chart, Ageas/ NV ranks #91 out of 487 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Ageas/ NV in the top 19% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. Ageas/ NV's value of 7 is 16.7% above this benchmark. Historically, Ageas/ NV's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 5.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 6.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, Ageas/ NV has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for an Insurance company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Insurance companies is 6.00, based on 487 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Ageas/ NV's current Piotroski F-Score of 7 is 16.7% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Ageas/ NV and its competitors. For the Insurance industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Ageas/ NV's current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its own 10-year median of 6.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Ageas/ NV stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ageas/ NV (CHIX:AGSB) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is €55.63, compared to a current price of €68.18 — trading 22.6% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 7, which is 17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00 and 16.7% above the Insurance industry median of 6.00. Ageas/ NV's overall GF Score™ is 68/100 with 8 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Ageas/ NV (CHIX:AGSB), the current Piotroski F-Score is 7 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.
Is Ageas/ NV (CHIX:AGSB) Overvalued in 2026?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Ageas/ NV stock appears to be overvalued.
The current stock price of €68.18 is trading 22.6% above its estimated GF Value™ of €55.63.
GuruFocus considers Ageas/ NV to be Modestly Overvalued.
Key valuation signals for CHIX:AGSB:
Piotroski F-Score: 7 (17% above median its 10-year median of 6.00)
GF Value™: €55.63 vs. price of €68.18 (22.6% above fair value)
Industry Position: 16.7% above the Insurance median (#91 of 487)
No single metric tells the full story. See the CHIX:AGSB stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.
Ageas was spun out of Fortis during the financial crisis after a consortium including Banco Santander and Royal Bank of Scotland launched a failed bid for ABN Amro. The takeover was badly timed and overly ambitious, and to fund it Fortis started selling noncore divisions while writing down collateralized debt. As Fortis' capital began to decline, the company initiated a rights issue, and suspended the dividend. As Fortis' share price began to decline and financial market conditions continued to deteriorate, with a series of leadership changes, customers began to withdraw deposits. Fortis was approached by the government and sold its domestic banking operations to the Belgian government. It also spun off its asset management and insurance units which later became Ageas.
68GF Score
Get the complete analysis for CHIX:AGSB
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.
Quick Browse
Personalize
Premium Gurus 
Create New Portfolio
CHIX:AGSB has been successfully added to your 
