Adalan Ventures (LSE:ZAIM) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jun. 27, 2026) — 25% Below Median


What is Adalan Ventures Piotroski F-Score?

Adalan Ventures LSE:ZAIM Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 27, 2026, which is 25% below its 10-year median of 4.00. The stock has 2 warning signs investors should review.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Adalan Ventures has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Adalan Ventures's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

LSE:ZAIM' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 4   Max: 5
Current: 3

During the past 6 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Adalan Ventures was 5. The lowest was 3. And the median was 4.

Adalan Ventures  (LSE:ZAIM) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Adalan Ventures Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Adalan Ventures Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Adalan Ventures's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Adalan Ventures Piotroski F-Score Chart

Adalan Ventures Annual Data
Trend Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial N/A 4.00 5.00 3.00 3.00

Adalan Ventures Semi-Annual Data
Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Jun23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00

LSE:ZAIM vs V, MA, AXP: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Credit Services subindustry, Adalan Ventures's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Adalan Ventures Piotroski F-Score vs Credit Services Industry

For the Credit Services industry and Financial Services sector, Adalan Ventures's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Adalan Ventures's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was £-0.45 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was £-0.33 Mil.
Revenue was £-0.02 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (0.002 + 0.079) / 2 = £0.0405 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was £0.00 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £0.04 Mil.
Total Assets was £0.08 Mil.
Total Liabilities was £1.50 Mil.
Net Income was £-0.40 Mil.

Revenue was £-0.01 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec21)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (5.343 + 0.002) / 2 = £2.6725 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec21) was £5.34 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was £0.03 Mil.
Total Assets was £0.00 Mil.
Total Liabilities was £0.97 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Adalan Ventures's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.45. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Adalan Ventures's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.33. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=-0.453/0.002
=-226.5

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec21)
=-0.397/5.343
=-0.07430283

Adalan Ventures's return on assets of this year was -226.5. Adalan Ventures's return on assets of last year was -0.07430283. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Adalan Ventures's current Net Income (TTM) was -0.45. Adalan Ventures's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -0.33. ==> -0.33 > -0.45 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=0.042/0.0405
=1.03703704

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec21 to Dec24
=0.03/2.6725
=0.01122544

Adalan Ventures's gearing of this year was 1.03703704. Adalan Ventures's gearing of last year was 0.01122544. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=0.079/1.504
=0.0525266

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=0.002/0.973
=0.0020555

Adalan Ventures's current ratio of this year was 0.0525266. Adalan Ventures's current ratio of last year was 0.0020555. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Adalan Ventures's number of shares in issue this year was 51.348. Adalan Ventures's number of shares in issue last year was 51.348. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=-0.453/-0.018
=25.16666667

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=-0.397/-0.01
=39.7

Adalan Ventures's net margin of this year was 25.16666667. Adalan Ventures's net margin of last year was 39.7. ==> Last year's net margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=-0.018/0.002
=-9

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec21)
=-0.01/5.343
=-0.00187161

Adalan Ventures's asset turnover of this year was -9. Adalan Ventures's asset turnover of last year was -0.00187161. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+0+1+1+0+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Adalan Ventures has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Adalan Ventures (LSE:ZAIM) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 27, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Adalan Ventures and its competitors. This is 25% below median its historical median of 4.00. Over the past decade, Adalan Ventures' Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 5.00.
Is Adalan Ventures' Piotroski F-Score too high?
Adalan Ventures' current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 5.00. The Credit Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Adalan Ventures' value of 3 is 40% below this industry median.
How does Adalan Ventures' Piotroski F-Score compare to V and MA?
Adalan Ventures' Piotroski F-Score of 3 can be compared against companies in the Credit Services industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Adalan Ventures' value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Adalan Ventures' own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 5.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 4.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Adalan Ventures has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Credit Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Credit Services companies is 5.00, based on 532 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Adalan Ventures's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Adalan Ventures and its competitors. For the Credit Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Adalan Ventures's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 25% below median its own 10-year median of 4.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Adalan Ventures stock overvalued right now?
Adalan Ventures (LSE:ZAIM) has a current Piotroski F-Score of 3. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is 25% below median its 10-year median of 4.00 and 40% below the Credit Services industry median of 5.00. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Adalan Ventures (LSE:ZAIM), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 27, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Adalan Ventures Business Description

Address Trekhgorny Lane, Room No.1 -12, Structure 7, Moscow, RUS, 123022
Adalan Ventures PLC Formerly Zaim Credit Systems PLC is a regulated microfinance company in the Russian Federation. The main activity of the company is to provide financial services, except for insurance and pension services. It also provides loans and other types of credit.