GURUFOCUS.COM » STOCK LIST » Industrials » Construction » Stantec Inc (TSX:STN) » Definitions » Piotroski F-Score

Stantec (TSX:STN) Piotroski F-Score : 6 (As of Jan. 19, 2025)


View and export this data going back to 1994. Start your Free Trial

What is Stantec Piotroski F-Score?

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Stantec has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for Stantec's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

TSX:STN' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 6   Max: 8
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Stantec was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 6.


Stantec Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

The historical data trend for Stantec's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

* Premium members only.

Stantec Piotroski F-Score Chart

Stantec Annual Data
Trend Dec14 Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 6.00 5.00 7.00 7.00 7.00

Stantec Quarterly Data
Dec19 Mar20 Jun20 Sep20 Dec20 Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 7.00 6.00 6.00 6.00

Competitive Comparison of Stantec's Piotroski F-Score

For the Engineering & Construction subindustry, Stantec's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Stantec's Piotroski F-Score Distribution in the Construction Industry

For the Construction industry and Industrials sector, Stantec's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Stantec's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Sep24) TTM:Last Year (Sep23) TTM:
Net Income was 85.2 + 79.4 + 84.6 + 103.2 = C$352 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 283.8 + 56.9 + 80.3 + 178.9 = C$600 Mil.
Revenue was 1609 + 1721.4 + 1889.7 + 1929.4 = C$7,150 Mil.
Gross Profit was 669.6 + 742.5 + 811.7 + 828.1 = C$3,052 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Sep23)
to the end of this year (Sep24) was
(6087.7 + 6076.7 + 6695.8 + 7110.3 + 6939.5) / 5 = C$6582 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Sep23) was C$6,088 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$2,016 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$2,622 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$1,851 Mil.
Net Income was 73.5 + 64.9 + 88 + 101.3 = C$328 Mil.

Revenue was 1513.5 + 1539.2 + 1638.2 + 1693.2 = C$6,384 Mil.
Gross Profit was 620.5 + 660 + 694 + 721.1 = C$2,696 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Sep22)
to the end of last year (Sep23) was
(5604.5 + 5652.9 + 5637 + 5985.8 + 6087.7) / 5 = C$5793.58 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Sep22) was C$5,605 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was C$1,744 Mil.
Total Current Assets was C$2,251 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was C$1,622 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Stantec's current Net Income (TTM) was 352. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Stantec's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 600. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep23)
=352.4/6087.7
=0.05788722

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Sep22)
=327.7/5604.5
=0.05847087

Stantec's return on assets of this year was 0.05788722. Stantec's return on assets of last year was 0.05847087. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Stantec's current Net Income (TTM) was 352. Stantec's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 600. ==> 600 > 352 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Sep24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep23 to Sep24
=2015.5/6582
=0.30621392

Gearing (Last Year: Sep23)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Sep22 to Sep23
=1743.8/5793.58
=0.30098834

Stantec's gearing of this year was 0.30621392. Stantec's gearing of last year was 0.30098834. ==> Last year is lower than this year ==> Score 0.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Sep24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2621.8/1851.4
=1.41611753

Current Ratio (Last Year: Sep23)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=2251.2/1622.3
=1.3876595

Stantec's current ratio of this year was 1.41611753. Stantec's current ratio of last year was 1.3876595. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Stantec's number of shares in issue this year was 114.067. Stantec's number of shares in issue last year was 110.959. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=3051.9/7149.5
=0.42686901

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=2695.6/6384.1
=0.42223649

Stantec's gross margin of this year was 0.42686901. Stantec's gross margin of last year was 0.42223649. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Sep23)
=7149.5/6087.7
=1.17441727

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Sep22)
=6384.1/5604.5
=1.13910251

Stantec's asset turnover of this year was 1.17441727. Stantec's asset turnover of last year was 1.13910251. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+0+1+0+1+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Stantec has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Stantec  (TSX:STN) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Stantec Piotroski F-Score Related Terms

Thank you for viewing the detailed overview of Stantec's Piotroski F-Score provided by GuruFocus.com. Please click on the following links to see related term pages.


Stantec Business Description

Traded in Other Exchanges
Address
10220 - 103 Avenue NW, Suite 400, Edmonton, AB, CAN, T5J 0K4
Stantec Inc is a sustainable engineering, architecture, and environmental consulting company. The company is geographically diversified in three regional operating units namely Canada, United States and Global, offering similar services across all regions. The company offers services in various sectors across the project life cycle through five business operating units infrastructure, water, buildings, environmental services, and energy and resources. The company provides professional services in all phases of the project life cycle: planning, design, construction administration, commissioning, maintenance, decommissioning, and remediation.
Executives
Asifa Samji Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6), Senior Officer
Shelley Ann Marie Brown Director
Steve Marvin Fleck Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6), Senior Officer
Robert Gomes Director
Leonardo De Oliveira Castro Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Michael Aloysius Kennedy Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Stuart Lerner Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6), Senior Officer
John David Take Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6), Senior Officer
Ryan Roberts Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Jeffrey Philip Stone Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Bjorn Morisbak Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Paul Jeremy David Alpern Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6), Senior Officer
Valentino Dimanno Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Robert Harold Seager Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6)
Theresa Jang Director or Senior Officer of Insider or Subsidiary (other than in 4,5,6), Senior Officer