CICHF (China Construction Bank) Piotroski F-Score: 5 (As of Jun. 24, 2026) — Near Median


CICHF China Construction Bank Corp CICHF
38 GF Score
Price $1.12
GF Value $0.87
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 8 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is China Construction Bank Piotroski F-Score?

China Construction Bank CICHF +2.18% 38 Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates CICHF with a GF Score™ of 38/100 and a GF Value™ of $0.87 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 8 warning signs investors should review. Among 1,498 Banks companies, China Construction Bank ranks worse than 57.21% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Construction Bank has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

CICHF' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 8
Current: 5

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of China Construction Bank was 8. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

China Construction Bank  (OTCPK:CICHF) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


China Construction Bank Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


China Construction Bank Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

China Construction Bank Piotroski F-Score Chart

China Construction Bank Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00

China Construction Bank Quarterly Data
Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25 Mar26
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 5.00

CICHF vs JPM, BAC, WFC: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Banks - Diversified subindustry, China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


China Construction Bank Piotroski F-Score vs Banks Industry

For the Banks industry and Financial Services sector, China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


CICHF
38GF Score
China Construction Bank Corp CICHF
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Mar26) TTM:Last Year (Mar25) TTM:
Net Income was 10963.874 + 13376.009 + 11577.976 + 12520.277 = $48,438 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 74584.564 + 78720.573 + 40302.987 + 86248.458 = $279,857 Mil.
Revenue was 28481.143 + 25115.042 + 26583.655 + 30615.342 = $110,795 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Mar25)
to the end of this year (Mar26) was
(5903289.283 + 6188074.202 + 6368932.968 + 6478847.399 + 6838708.376) / 5 = $6355570.4456 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Mar25) was $5,903,289 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $419,376 Mil.
Total Assets was $6,838,708 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $6,291,661 Mil.
Net Income was 10683.97 + 12923.968 + 10960.622 + 11497.8 = $46,066 Mil.

Revenue was 25471.212 + 25893.019 + 24366.888 + 26218.531 = $101,950 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Mar24)
to the end of last year (Mar25) was
(5516806.36 + 5554245.799 + 5783358.112 + 5572424.217 + 5903289.283) / 5 = $5666024.7542 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Mar24) was $5,516,806 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was $462,968 Mil.
Total Assets was $5,903,289 Mil.
Total Liabilities was $5,432,716 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Construction Bank's current Net Income (TTM) was 48,438. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

China Construction Bank's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 279,857. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar25)
=48438.136/5903289.283
=0.00820528

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Mar24)
=46066.36/5516806.36
=0.00835019

China Construction Bank's return on assets of this year was 0.00820528. China Construction Bank's return on assets of last year was 0.00835019. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

China Construction Bank's current Net Income (TTM) was 48,438. China Construction Bank's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 279,857. ==> 279,857 > 48,438 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Mar26)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar25 to Mar26
=419376.387/6355570.4456
=0.06598564

Gearing (Last Year: Mar25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Mar24 to Mar25
=462968.287/5666024.7542
=0.08170954

China Construction Bank's gearing of this year was 0.06598564. China Construction Bank's gearing of last year was 0.08170954. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Mar26)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=6838708.376/6291661.032
=1.086948

Current Ratio (Last Year: Mar25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=5903289.283/5432715.848
=1.08661845

China Construction Bank's current ratio of this year was 1.086948. China Construction Bank's current ratio of last year was 1.08661845. ==> This year's current ratio is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

China Construction Bank's number of shares in issue this year was 261487.879. China Construction Bank's number of shares in issue last year was 252578.788. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=48438.136/110795.182
=0.4371863

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=46066.36/101949.65
=0.45185403

China Construction Bank's net margin of this year was 0.4371863. China Construction Bank's net margin of last year was 0.45185403. ==> Last year's net margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Mar25)
=110795.182/5903289.283
=0.01876838

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Mar24)
=101949.65/5516806.36
=0.01847983

China Construction Bank's asset turnover of this year was 0.01876838. China Construction Bank's asset turnover of last year was 0.01847983. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+0+1+1+1+0+0+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

China Construction Bank has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 5 mean?
China Construction Bank (CICHF) has a Piotroski F-Score of 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Construction Bank and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00. According to the industry distribution chart, China Construction Bank ranks #857 out of 1498 companies in the Banks industry, placing it in the top 57.2%.
Is China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score too high?
China Construction Bank's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is near median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 8.00. The Banks industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. China Construction Bank's value of 5 is 16.7% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, China Construction Bank ranks #857 out of 1498 companies in the Banks industry, which is below the industry midpoint. Overall, China Construction Bank has a GF Score™ of 38/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does China Construction Bank's Piotroski F-Score compare to JPM and BAC?
According to the Banks industry distribution chart, China Construction Bank ranks #857 out of 1498 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places China Construction Bank in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00. China Construction Bank's value of 5 is 16.7% below this benchmark. Historically, China Construction Bank's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 8.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 6.00, China Construction Bank has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Banks company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Banks companies is 6.00, based on 1,498 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. China Construction Bank's current Piotroski F-Score of 5 is 16.7% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on China Construction Bank and its competitors. For the Banks industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 6.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. China Construction Bank's current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is China Construction Bank stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, China Construction Bank (CICHF) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is $0.87, compared to a current price of $1.12 — trading 29.2% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 5, which is near median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 16.7% below the Banks industry median of 6.00. China Construction Bank's overall GF Score™ is 38/100 with 8 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For China Construction Bank (CICHF), the current Piotroski F-Score is 5 as of Jun. 24, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is China Construction Bank (CICHF) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, China Construction Bank stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of $1.12 is trading 29.2% above its estimated GF Value™ of $0.87. GuruFocus considers China Construction Bank to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for CICHF:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 5 (near median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: $0.87 vs. price of $1.12 (29.2% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 38/100 with 8 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 16.7% below the Banks median (#857 of 1498)

No single metric tells the full story. See the CICHF stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


China Construction Bank Business Description

Address No. 25, Financial Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, CHN, 100033
China Construction Bank, headquartered in Beijing, is China's second-largest bank. It went public on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 2005 and listed shares in mainland China in 2007. Central Huijin Investment, China's sovereign wealth fund manager, is the largest shareholder with a 57% share. Fullerton Financial Holdings (a subsidiary of Temasek) is the second-largest shareholder with a 4.99% stake. CCB strives to provide customers with comprehensive financial services. The corporate banking, retail banking, and wholesale banking business segments accounted for 22%, 41%, and 34% of profit before tax, respectively, in 2025.
38GF Score

Get the complete analysis for CICHF

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

$1.12
Price
$0.87
GF Value