Banqup Group (FRA:60Z) Piotroski F-Score: 3 (As of Jun. 29, 2026) — Near Median


FRA:60Z Banqup Group SA FRA:60Z
51 GF Score
Price €2.10
GF Value €2.19
Valuation Fairly Valued
! 5 Warning Signs
View Full Analysis

What is Banqup Group Piotroski F-Score?

Banqup Group FRA:60Z 51 Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 29, 2026, which is at its 10-year median of 3.00. GuruFocus rates FRA:60Z with a GF Score™ of 51/100 and a GF Value™ of €2.19 (Fairly Valued). The stock has 5 warning signs investors should review. Among 2,743 Software companies, Banqup Group ranks worse than 78.93% on this metric.

Warning Sign:

Piotroski F-Score of 3 is low, which usually implies poor business operation.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Banqup Group has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

The historical rank and industry rank for Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

FRA:60Z' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2   Med: 3   Max: 6
Current: 3

During the past 10 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of Banqup Group was 6. The lowest was 2. And the median was 3.

Banqup Group  (FRA:60Z) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


Banqup Group Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


Banqup Group Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Banqup Group Piotroski F-Score Chart

Banqup Group Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 5.00 2.00 3.00 6.00 3.00

Banqup Group Semi-Annual Data
Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Jun19 Dec19 Jun20 Dec20 Jun21 Dec21 Jun22 Dec22 Jun23 Dec23 Jun24 Dec24 Jun25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 3.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 3.00

FRA:60Z vs UBER, SHOP, CRM: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Software - Application subindustry, Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Banqup Group Piotroski F-Score vs Software Industry

For the Software industry and Technology sector, Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


FRA:60Z
51GF Score
Banqup Group SA FRA:60Z
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was €-44.90 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was €-10.75 Mil.
Revenue was €51.64 Mil.
Gross Profit was €27.44 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was (323.284 + 268.695) / 2 = €295.9895 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was €323.28 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €4.74 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €113.88 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €156.24 Mil.
Net Income was €71.03 Mil.

Revenue was €54.37 Mil.
Gross Profit was €26.88 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was (277.978 + 323.284) / 2 = €300.631 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was €277.98 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was €35.39 Mil.
Total Current Assets was €148.16 Mil.
Total Current Liabilities was €137.79 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Banqup Group's current Net Income (TTM) was -44.90. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

Banqup Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -10.75. ==> Negative ==> Score 0.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=-44.895/323.284
=-0.1388717

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=71.031/277.978
=0.25552742

Banqup Group's return on assets of this year was -0.1388717. Banqup Group's return on assets of last year was 0.25552742. ==> Last year is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

Banqup Group's current Net Income (TTM) was -44.90. Banqup Group's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was -10.75. ==> -10.75 > -44.90 ==> CFROA > ROA ==> Score 1.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=4.741/295.9895
=0.01601746

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=35.386/300.631
=0.11770576

Banqup Group's gearing of this year was 0.01601746. Banqup Group's gearing of last year was 0.11770576. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=113.879/156.238
=0.72888158

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Current Assets/Total Current Liabilities
=148.159/137.79
=1.0752522

Banqup Group's current ratio of this year was 0.72888158. Banqup Group's current ratio of last year was 1.0752522. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

Banqup Group's number of shares in issue this year was 37.134. Banqup Group's number of shares in issue last year was 36.695. ==> There is larger number of shares in issue this year. ==> Score 0.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

Gross Margin (This Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=27.444/51.64
=0.53144849

Gross Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Gross Profit/Revenue
=26.88/54.371
=0.4943812

Banqup Group's gross margin of this year was 0.53144849. Banqup Group's gross margin of last year was 0.4943812. ==> This year's gross margin is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=51.64/323.284
=0.15973571

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=54.371/277.978
=0.19559462

Banqup Group's asset turnover of this year was 0.15973571. Banqup Group's asset turnover of last year was 0.19559462. ==> Last year's asset turnover is higher ==> Score 0.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=0+0+0+1+1+0+0+1+0
=3

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

Banqup Group has an F-score of 3. It is a bad or low score, which usually implies poor business operation.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 3 mean?
Banqup Group (FRA:60Z) has a Piotroski F-Score of 3 as of Jun. 29, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Banqup Group and its competitors. This is near median its historical median of 3.00. Over the past decade, Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00. According to the industry distribution chart, Banqup Group ranks #2165 out of 2743 companies in the Software industry, placing it in the top 78.9%.
Is Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score too high?
Banqup Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is near median its 10-year median of 3.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 2.00 to a high of 6.00. The Software industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Banqup Group's value of 3 is 40% below this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Banqup Group ranks #2165 out of 2743 companies in the Software industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers. Overall, Banqup Group has a GF Score™ of 51/100 and is considered Fairly Valued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does Banqup Group's Piotroski F-Score compare to UBER and SHOP?
According to the Software industry distribution chart, Banqup Group ranks #2165 out of 2743 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places Banqup Group in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. Banqup Group's value of 3 is 40% below this benchmark. Historically, Banqup Group's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 2.00 to 6.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 3.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, Banqup Group has consistently been below the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Software company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Software companies is 5.00, based on 2,743 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Banqup Group's current Piotroski F-Score of 3 is 40% below the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on Banqup Group and its competitors. For the Software industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Banqup Group's current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its own 10-year median of 3.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Banqup Group stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Banqup Group (FRA:60Z) is currently considered Fairly Valued. The stock's GF Value™ is €2.19, compared to a current price of €2.10 — trading 4.1% below its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 3, which is near median its 10-year median of 3.00 and 40% below the Software industry median of 5.00. Banqup Group's overall GF Score™ is 51/100 with 5 warning signs to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Banqup Group (FRA:60Z), the current Piotroski F-Score is 3 as of Jun. 29, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is Banqup Group (FRA:60Z) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, Banqup Group stock appears to be undervalued. The current stock price of €2.10 is trading 4.1% below its estimated GF Value™ of €2.19. GuruFocus considers Banqup Group to be Fairly Valued.

Key valuation signals for FRA:60Z:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 3 (near median its 10-year median of 3.00)
  • GF Value™: €2.19 vs. price of €2.10 (4.1% below fair value)
  • GF Score™: 51/100 with 5 warning signs
  • Industry Position: 40% below the Software median (#2165 of 2743)

No single metric tells the full story. See the FRA:60Z stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


Banqup Group Business Description

Other Exchanges 60Z:GermanyBANQ:Belgium
Address Avenue Reine Astrid 92A, La Hulpe, BEL, 1310
Banqup Group SA provides integrated cloud-based SaaS solutions to streamline business transactions across the entire lifecycle, from e-invoicing and e-payments to tax reporting. The Group provides solutions for businesses, unifying purchase-to-pay, order-to-cash, e-invoicing compliance, and e-payments into one secure platform, removing the complexity of juggling disconnected tools. Its operating segments are: Digital Services, Traditional Communication Services, and Corporate. Maximum revenue is generated from the Digital Services segment, which groups CGUs Digital Document Processing and Payment: focusing on the core digital services of the Group, i.e., e-trust, e-invoicing, e-payments, and e-reporting. Geographically, the Group mainly operates across different markets in Europe.
51GF Score

Get the complete analysis for FRA:60Z

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

€2.10
Price
€2.19
GF Value