National Finance CoOG (MUS:NFCI) Piotroski F-Score: 6 (As of Jun. 28, 2026) — 20% Above Median


MUS:NFCI National Finance Co SAOG MUS:NFCI
20 GF Score
Price ر.ع0.21
GF Value ر.ع0.18
Valuation Modestly Overvalued
! 1 Warning Sign
View Full Analysis

What is National Finance CoOG Piotroski F-Score?

National Finance CoOG MUS:NFCI +0.47% 20 Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 28, 2026, which is 20% above its 10-year median of 5.00. GuruFocus rates MUS:NFCI with a GF Score™ of 20/100 and a GF Value™ of ر.ع0.18 (Modestly Overvalued). The stock has 1 warning sign investors should review. Among 531 Credit Services companies, National Finance CoOG ranks better than 80.98% on this metric.

The zones of discrimination were as such:

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

National Finance CoOG has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

The historical rank and industry rank for National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score or its related term are showing as below:

MUS:NFCI' s Piotroski F-Score Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3   Med: 5   Max: 7
Current: 6

During the past 13 years, the highest Piotroski F-Score of National Finance CoOG was 7. The lowest was 3. And the median was 5.

National Finance CoOG  (MUS:NFCI) Piotroski F-Score Explanation

The developer of the system is Joseph D. Piotroski is relatively unknown accounting professor who shuns publicity and rarely gives interviews.

He graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.S. in accounting in 1989, received an M.B.A. from Indiana University in 1994. Five years later, in 1999, after earning a Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Michigan, he became an associate professor of accounting at the University of Chicago.

In 2000, he wrote a research paper called "Value Investing: The Use of Historical Financial Statement Information to Separate Winners from Losers" (pdf).

He wanted to see if he can develop a system (using a simple nine-point scoring system) that can increase the returns of a strategy of investing in low price to book (referred to in the paper as high book to market) value companies.

What he found was something that exceeded his most optimistic expectations.

Buying only those companies that scored highest (8 or 9) on his nine-point scale, or F-Score as he called it, over the 20 year period from 1976 to 1996 led to an average out-performance over the market of 13.4%.

Even more impressive were the results of a strategy of investing in the highest F-Score companies (8 or 9) and shorting companies with the lowest F-Score (0 or 1).

Over the same period from 1976 to 1996 (20 years) this strategy led to an average yearly return of 23%, substantially outperforming the average S&P 500 index return of 15.83% over the same period.


National Finance CoOG Piotroski F-Score Related Terms


National Finance CoOG Piotroski F-Score Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

National Finance CoOG Piotroski F-Score Chart

National Finance CoOG Annual Data
Trend Dec16 Dec17 Dec18 Dec19 Dec20 Dec21 Dec22 Dec23 Dec24 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 7.00 6.00 6.00 4.00 6.00

National Finance CoOG Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25
Piotroski F-Score Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 6.00

MUS:NFCI vs V, MA, AXP: Piotroski F-Score Comparison

For the Credit Services subindustry, National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score, along with its competitors' market caps and Piotroski F-Score data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


National Finance CoOG Piotroski F-Score vs Credit Services Industry

For the Credit Services industry and Financial Services sector, National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score falls into.


MUS:NFCI
20GF Score
National Finance Co SAOG MUS:NFCI
Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Score™, valuation, warning signs, and more.
View Full Analysis

How is the Piotroski F-Score calculated?

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

This Year (Dec25) TTM:Last Year (Dec24) TTM:
Net Income was 3.312 + 3.705 + 3.99 + 4.203 = ر.ع15.21 Mil.
Cash Flow from Operations was 5.712 + 7.933 + 0.522 + -1.292 = ر.ع12.88 Mil.
Revenue was 9.983 + 10.341 + 11.3 + 12.492 = ر.ع44.12 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of this year (Dec24)
to the end of this year (Dec25) was
(606.491 + 635.267 + 648.534 + 674.123 + 683.928) / 5 = ر.ع649.6686 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of this year (Dec24) was ر.ع606.49 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ر.ع416.23 Mil.
Total Assets was ر.ع683.93 Mil.
Total Liabilities was ر.ع533.16 Mil.
Net Income was 2.424 + 3.432 + 2.897 + 3.361 = ر.ع12.11 Mil.

Revenue was 7.527 + 7.941 + 8.873 + 9.355 = ر.ع33.70 Mil.
Average Total Assets from the begining of last year (Dec23)
to the end of last year (Dec24) was
(512.486 + 539.062 + 562.724 + 594.991 + 606.491) / 5 = ر.ع563.1508 Mil.
Total Assets at the begining of last year (Dec23) was ر.ع512.49 Mil.
Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation was ر.ع385.78 Mil.
Total Assets was ر.ع606.49 Mil.
Total Liabilities was ر.ع460.89 Mil.

*Note: If the latest quarterly/semi-annual/annual total assets data is 0, then we will use previous quarterly/semi-annual/annual data for all the items in the balance sheet.

Profitability

Question 1. Return on Assets (ROA)

Net income before extraordinary items for the year divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

National Finance CoOG's current Net Income (TTM) was 15.21. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 2. Cash Flow Return on Assets (CFROA)

Net cash flow from operating activities (operating cash flow) divided by Total Assets at the beginning of the year.

Score 1 if positive, 0 if negative.

National Finance CoOG's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 12.88. ==> Positive ==> Score 1.

Question 3. Change in Return on Assets

Compare this year's return on assets (1) to last year's return on assets.

Score 1 if it's higher, 0 if it's lower.

ROA (This Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec24)
=15.21/606.491
=0.02507869

ROA (Last Year)=Net Income/Total Assets (Dec23)
=12.114/512.486
=0.02363772

National Finance CoOG's return on assets of this year was 0.02507869. National Finance CoOG's return on assets of last year was 0.02363772. ==> This year is higher. ==> Score 1.

Question 4. Quality of Earnings (Accrual)

Compare Cash flow return on assets (2) to return on assets (1)

Score 1 if CFROA > ROA, 0 if CFROA <= ROA.

National Finance CoOG's current Net Income (TTM) was 15.21. National Finance CoOG's current Cash Flow from Operations (TTM) was 12.88. ==> 12.88 <= 15.21 ==> CFROA <= ROA ==> Score 0.

Funding

Question 5. Change in Gearing or Leverage

Compare this year's gearing (long-term debt divided by average total assets) to last year's gearing.

Score 0 if this year's gearing is higher, 1 otherwise.

Gearing (This Year: Dec25)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec24 to Dec25
=416.231/649.6686
=0.64068203

Gearing (Last Year: Dec24)=Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation/Average Total Assets from Dec23 to Dec24
=385.778/563.1508
=0.68503499

National Finance CoOG's gearing of this year was 0.64068203. National Finance CoOG's gearing of last year was 0.68503499. ==> This year is lower or equal to last year. ==> Score 1.

Question 6. Change in Working Capital (Liquidity)

Compare this year's current ratio (current assets divided by current liabilities) to last year's current ratio.

Score 1 if this year's current ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Total Current Assets and Total Current Liabilities reported. Thus, we use Total Assets and Total Liabilities to calculate current ratio for banks and insurance companies.

Current Ratio (This Year: Dec25)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=683.928/533.159
=1.28278431

Current Ratio (Last Year: Dec24)=Total Assets/Total Liabilities
=606.491/460.888
=1.3159184

National Finance CoOG's current ratio of this year was 1.28278431. National Finance CoOG's current ratio of last year was 1.3159184. ==> Last year's current ratio is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 7. Change in Shares in Issue

Compare the number of shares in issue this year, to the number in issue last year.

Score 0 if there is larger number of shares in issue this year, 1 otherwise.

National Finance CoOG's number of shares in issue this year was 650.696. National Finance CoOG's number of shares in issue last year was 650.696. ==> There is smaller number of shares in issue this year, or the same. ==> Score 1.

Efficiency

Question 8. Change in Gross Margin

Compare this year's gross margin (Gross Profit divided by sales) to last year's.

Score 1 if this year's gross margin is higher, 0 if it's lower.

* Note that for banks and insurance companies, there's no Gross Profit reported. Thus, we use net income instead of gross profit and calculate Net Margin for this score.

Net Margin (This Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=15.21/44.116
=0.34477287

Net Margin (Last Year: TTM)=Net Income/Revenue
=12.114/33.696
=0.35950855

National Finance CoOG's net margin of this year was 0.34477287. National Finance CoOG's net margin of last year was 0.35950855. ==> Last year's net margin is higher ==> Score 0.

Question 9. Change in asset turnover

Compare this year's asset turnover (total sales for the year divided by total assets at the beginning of the year) to last year's asset turnover ratio.

Score 1 if this year's asset turnover ratio is higher, 0 if it's lower

Asset Turnover (This Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of This Year (Dec24)
=44.116/606.491
=0.07273974

Asset Turnover (Last Year)=Revenue/Total Assets at the Beginning of Last Year (Dec23)
=33.696/512.486
=0.06575009

National Finance CoOG's asset turnover of this year was 0.07273974. National Finance CoOG's asset turnover of last year was 0.06575009. ==> This year's asset turnover is higher. ==> Score 1.

Evaluation

Piotroski F-Score= Que. 1+ Que. 2+ Que. 3+Que. 4+Que. 5+Que. 6+Que. 7+Que. 8+Que. 9
=1+1+1+0+1+0+1+0+1
=6

Good or high score = 7, 8, 9
Bad or low score = 0, 1, 2, 3

National Finance CoOG has an F-score of 6 indicating the company's financial situation is typical for a stable company.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Piotroski F-Score →
What does a Piotroski F-Score of 6 mean?
National Finance CoOG (MUS:NFCI) has a Piotroski F-Score of 6 as of Jun. 28, 2026. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on National Finance CoOG and its competitors. This is 20% above median its historical median of 5.00. Over the past decade, National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00. According to the industry distribution chart, National Finance CoOG ranks #101 out of 531 companies in the Credit Services industry, placing it in the top 19%.
Is National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score too high?
National Finance CoOG's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00. Over the past 10 years, this metric has ranged from a low of 3.00 to a high of 7.00. The Credit Services industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. National Finance CoOG's value of 6 is 20% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, National Finance CoOG ranks #101 out of 531 companies in the Credit Services industry, which is in the top quartile — a strong position relative to peers. Overall, National Finance CoOG has a GF Score™ of 20/100 and is considered Modestly Overvalued, reflecting its overall financial health beyond just this single metric.
How does National Finance CoOG's Piotroski F-Score compare to V and MA?
According to the Credit Services industry distribution chart, National Finance CoOG ranks #101 out of 531 companies for Piotroski F-Score. This places National Finance CoOG in the top 19% of its industry — outperforming the majority of peers. The industry median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00. National Finance CoOG's value of 6 is 20% above this benchmark. Historically, National Finance CoOG's own Piotroski F-Score has ranged from 3.00 to 7.00 over the past decade. While the company's 10-year median is 5.00 vs. the industry median of 5.00, National Finance CoOG has consistently been above the industry average. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Piotroski F-Score for a Credit Services company?
The median Piotroski F-Score among Credit Services companies is 5.00, based on 531 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Piotroski F-Score significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Piotroski F-Score should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. National Finance CoOG's current Piotroski F-Score of 6 is 20% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Piotroski F-Score mean?
A high Piotroski F-Score can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. The Piotroski F-score grades a company's business operating strength from 0-9. View historical data on National Finance CoOG and its competitors. For the Credit Services industry, the median Piotroski F-Score is 5.00 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. National Finance CoOG's current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its own 10-year median of 5.00. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is National Finance CoOG stock overvalued right now?
Based on GuruFocus' analysis, National Finance CoOG (MUS:NFCI) is currently considered Modestly Overvalued. The stock's GF Value™ is ر.ع0.18, compared to a current price of ر.ع0.21 — trading 17.8% above its estimated fair value. The current Piotroski F-Score is 6, which is 20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00 and 20% above the Credit Services industry median of 5.00. National Finance CoOG's overall GF Score™ is 20/100 with 1 warning sign to review. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Piotroski F-Score calculated?
Piotroski F-Score is calculated from a company's financial statements. For National Finance CoOG (MUS:NFCI), the current Piotroski F-Score is 6 as of Jun. 28, 2026. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Is National Finance CoOG (MUS:NFCI) Overvalued in 2026?

Based on GuruFocus' analysis, National Finance CoOG stock appears to be overvalued. The current stock price of ر.ع0.21 is trading 17.8% above its estimated GF Value™ of ر.ع0.18. GuruFocus considers National Finance CoOG to be Modestly Overvalued.

Key valuation signals for MUS:NFCI:

  • Piotroski F-Score: 6 (20% above median its 10-year median of 5.00)
  • GF Value™: ر.ع0.18 vs. price of ر.ع0.21 (17.8% above fair value)
  • GF Score™: 20/100 with 1 warning sign
  • Industry Position: 20% above the Credit Services median (#101 of 531)

No single metric tells the full story. See the MUS:NFCI stock analysis page for a complete view including 30-year financials, guru trades, and insider activity.


National Finance CoOG Business Description

Address Madinat Al Erfaan Muscat Hills, Block No 9993 Building No 95, Fifth Floor, Airport Heights, Seeb, OMN, 112
National Finance Co SAOG is a financial institution. The company is engaged in the leasing business. It offers a wide range of financial products to corporate and retail customers with a key focus on Small and Medium Enterprises. The company offers vehicle finance, consumer durables finance, special schemes, equipment finance, corporate deposits, and factoring services. Thec company has three segments: Retail, SME, and Corporate.
20GF Score

Get the complete analysis for MUS:NFCI

Piotroski F-Score is just one metric. See GF Value™, 30-year financials, guru trades, warning signs, and more.

ر.ع0.21
Price
ر.ع0.18
GF Value