KSMRF (Contagious Gaming) Debt-to-EBITDA : 60.25 (As of Dec. 2025)

Author: Vera Yuan Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Vera Yuan
Director of Data and Quant Analytics at GuruFocus
Focused on building reliable datasets, financial models, and research tools for value-minded investors. Committed to turning complex data into practical guidance for value-investing and long-term wealth.
Reviewed by: Charlie Tian Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Charlie Tian
Founder & CEO of GuruFocus
Dr. Charlie Tian is the founder and CEO of GuruFocus.com, a leading global investment research platform established in 2004. With a Ph.D. in physics, Dr. Tian transitioned from science to finance, applying a data-driven, disciplined approach to value investing.

What is Contagious Gaming Debt-to-EBITDA?

Contagious Gaming KSMRF -72.00% Debt-to-EBITDA is 60.25 as of Dec. 2025. Among 304 Interactive Media companies, Contagious Gaming ranks worse than 328947.04% on this metric.

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Contagious Gaming's Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $0.24 Mil. Contagious Gaming's Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $0.00 Mil. Contagious Gaming's annualized EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was $0.00 Mil. Contagious Gaming's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 was 60.25.

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt. According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.

The historical rank and industry rank for Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA or its related term are showing as below:

KSMRF' s Debt-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.32   Med: -0.41   Max: 1.79
Current: -13.32

During the past 13 years, the highest Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio of Contagious Gaming was 1.79. The lowest was -13.32. And the median was -0.41.

KSMRF's Debt-to-EBITDA is ranked worse than
100% of 304 companies
in the Interactive Media industry
Industry Median: 0.67 vs KSMRF: -13.32

Contagious Gaming  (OTCPK:KSMRF) Debt-to-EBITDA Explanation

In the calculation of Debt-to-EBITDA, we use the total of Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation and Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation divided by EBITDA. In some calculations, Total Liabilities is used to for calculation.


Be Aware

A high Debt-to-EBITDA ratio generally means that a company may spend more time to paying off its debt.

According to Joel Tillinghast's BIG MONEY THINKS SMALL: Biases, Blind Spots, and Smarter Investing, a ratio of Debt-to-EBITDA exceeding four is usually considered scary unless tangible assets cover the debt.


Contagious Gaming Debt-to-EBITDA Related Terms


Contagious Gaming Debt-to-EBITDA Historical Data

* Premium members only.

The historical data trend for Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA can be seen below:

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

Contagious Gaming Debt-to-EBITDA Chart

Contagious Gaming Annual Data
Trend Mar16 Mar17 Mar18 Mar19 Mar20 Mar21 Mar22 Mar23 Mar24 Mar25
Debt-to-EBITDA
Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -0.32 -0.70 -0.67 1.79 -4.46

Contagious Gaming Quarterly Data
Mar21 Jun21 Sep21 Dec21 Mar22 Jun22 Sep22 Dec22 Mar23 Jun23 Sep23 Dec23 Mar24 Jun24 Sep24 Dec24 Mar25 Jun25 Sep25 Dec25
Debt-to-EBITDA Get a 7-Day Free Trial Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only Premium Member Only -8.79 -5.80 -10.17 -15.06 60.25

KSMRF vs BHATF, FRZT, MGAM: Debt-to-EBITDA Comparison

For the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia subindustry, Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA, along with its competitors' market caps and Debt-to-EBITDA data, can be viewed below:

* Competitive companies are chosen from companies within the same industry, with headquarter located in same country, with closest market capitalization; x-axis shows the market cap, and y-axis shows the term value; the bigger the dot, the larger the market cap. Note that "N/A" values will not show up in the chart.


Contagious Gaming Debt-to-EBITDA vs Interactive Media Industry

For the Interactive Media industry and Communication Services sector, Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA distribution charts can be found below:

* The bar in red indicates where Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA falls into.



Contagious Gaming Debt-to-EBITDA Calculation

Debt-to-EBITDA measures a company's ability to pay off its debt.

Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA for the fiscal year that ended in Mar. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(0.232 + 0) / -0.052
=-4.46

Contagious Gaming's annualized Debt-to-EBITDA for the quarter that ended in Dec. 2025 is calculated as

Debt-to-EBITDA=Total Debt / EBITDA
=(Short-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation + Long-Term Debt & Capital Lease Obligation) / EBITDA
=(0.241 + 0) / 0.004
=60.25

* For Operating Data section: All numbers are indicated by the unit behind each term and all currency related amount are in USD.
* For other sections: All numbers are in millions except for per share data, ratio, and percentage. All currency related amount are indicated in the company's associated stock exchange currency.

In the calculation of annual Debt-to-EBITDA, the EBITDA of the last fiscal year is used. In calculating the annualized quarterly data, the EBITDA data used here is four times the quarterly (Dec. 2025) EBITDA data.

Frequently Asked Questions Learn more about Debt-to-EBITDA →
What does a Debt-to-EBITDA of 60.25 mean?
Contagious Gaming (KSMRF) has a Debt-to-EBITDA of 60.25 as of Dec. 2025. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Contagious Gaming. According to the industry distribution chart, Contagious Gaming ranks #999999 out of 304 companies in the Interactive Media industry.
Is Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA too high?
Contagious Gaming's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 60.25. The Interactive Media industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.67. Contagious Gaming's value of 60.25 is 8892.5% above this industry median. Based on the distribution chart, Contagious Gaming ranks #999999 out of 304 companies in the Interactive Media industry, which is in the bottom quartile relative to peers.
How does Contagious Gaming's Debt-to-EBITDA compare to BHATF and FRZT?
According to the Interactive Media industry distribution chart, Contagious Gaming ranks #999999 out of 304 companies for Debt-to-EBITDA. This places Contagious Gaming in the lower half of its industry. The industry median Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.67. Contagious Gaming's value of 60.25 is 8892.5% above this benchmark. See the competitive comparison table and distribution chart on this page for a detailed peer-by-peer breakdown.
What is a good Debt-to-EBITDA for an Interactive Media company?
The median Debt-to-EBITDA among Interactive Media companies is 0.67, based on 304 companies in the industry. Companies in the top quartile (top 25%) have a Debt-to-EBITDA significantly above this median, while those in the bottom quartile fall well below. However, Debt-to-EBITDA should not be evaluated in isolation — investors should consider it alongside profitability, growth, and financial strength metrics. Contagious Gaming's current Debt-to-EBITDA of 60.25 is 8892.5% above the industry median. Use the industry distribution chart on this page to see where any company falls relative to its peers.
What does a high Debt-to-EBITDA mean?
A high Debt-to-EBITDA can signal that a stock is expensive relative to its fundamentals. Debt-to-EBITDA ratio represents the ratio of total debt to total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. View historical data on Contagious Gaming. For the Interactive Media industry, the median Debt-to-EBITDA is 0.67 — values significantly above this may indicate overvaluation, while values below may suggest a bargain or underlying issues. Contagious Gaming's current Debt-to-EBITDA is 60.25. However, context matters — high-growth companies often justify higher valuations. Always evaluate alongside other metrics like GF Score™ and GF Value™.
Is Contagious Gaming stock overvalued right now?
Contagious Gaming (KSMRF) has a current Debt-to-EBITDA of 60.25. The current Debt-to-EBITDA is 60.25 and 8892.5% above the Interactive Media industry median of 0.67. Investors should evaluate multiple metrics — including profitability, growth, and financial strength — before making a decision.
How is Debt-to-EBITDA calculated?
Debt-to-EBITDA is calculated from a company's financial statements. For Contagious Gaming (KSMRF), the current Debt-to-EBITDA is 60.25 as of Dec. 2025. GuruFocus calculates this using data sourced from SEC filings and annual reports. See the calculation section and 30-year financial data on this page for the full breakdown.

Contagious Gaming Business Description

Address 789 West Pender Street, Suite 800, Vancouver, BC, CAN, V6C 1H2
Contagious Gaming Inc is principally engaged in the development and production of video games software solutions, game application interface, payment systems interface, data feed handler, affiliate management, presentation layer, and lottery markets. The Company is in the business of developing software solutions for regulated gaming and lottery markets. The Company is currently focused on capitalizing on its proprietary digital instant lottery content while pursuing other opportunities to grow the business through potential transactions.